Updated:
May 06, 2025Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 3.4 oz.
Waterproof
No (WP available)
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
Vibram TC5+
Pros
Cons
Merrell Moab Speed 2
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Hiking Shoes.
The Merrell Moab Speed 2 impressed me with its comfort right out of the box. I’ve worn this shoe in Colorado’s La Plata mountains and Weminuche Wilderness, on trails around Moab, Utah, and up Mount Humphreys, the highest point in Arizona. The Speed 2 is roomy, soft, and comfortable, requiring no break-in period. While the midsole is stiff, it’s not an issue on the trail thanks to plentiful cushioning and the Speed 2’s rockered shape, which promotes a natural stride and helps limit foot fatigue. I felt very secure and comfortable in the Speed 2—it's nearly as cushy as a trail running shoe such as the Hoka Speedgoat. One ding against it, though, is that even for a lightweight hiking shoe it feels clunky rather than nimble due to its large base (more on this below).
I feel supported and stable in the Merrell Moab Speed 2, whether I’m on a casual hike or tackling a steep, challenging trail. It offers a well-balanced foundation—significantly more stable than a trail runner, but not as reinforced as a traditional hiking shoe such as the Merrell Moab 3 or Keen Targhee IV. The Speed 2 features a proprietary integrated plate that runs underfoot, from the heel to partway up the forefoot and slightly up the sides. This design adds a healthy boost in stiffness compared to a typical trail runner, striking the right balance between torsional stability and flexibility for fast hiking (particularly at the ball of the foot).
Overall, the Speed 2 felt reliable as I navigated boulder fields and uneven trails, and most hikers will find it sufficiently stable for backcountry routes. While I only wore this shoe for hiking adventures, I have no doubt it can handle the weight of a backpacking pack with ease (something other Better Trail testers have found wearing the Moab Speed 2 on backpacking trips that featured a mix of on- and off-trail travel).
The Moab Speed 2’s traction is reliably grippy. Its Vibram TC5+ outsole sports aggressive, 4-millimeter lugs that are smartly spaced and sticky. I’ve worn this shoe on moderate and strenuous hikes in Silverton, Colorado, that feature steep, rocky sections and boulder fields, and the Speed 2 handled the terrain with ease—it performed even better than my zero-drop Altra trail shoes, which offer better ground feel.
Although we didn’t get a chance to test this version of the Speed 2 on slick trails, we’ve used the Speed 2 Mid—which has the exact same outsole materials and design—in wet conditions. The outsole offered solid traction on wet slickrock, but the relatively shallow lug depth can cause slippage in mud. Additionally, it’s worth noting that the Vibram TC5+ outsole is softer than Vibram’s popular Megagrip compound, found on hiking shoes like the Topo Athletic Traverse, and will therefore wear out faster, making the Speed 2’s traction less dependable over time.
After over 50 miles of trail use thus far, the Speed 2 has held up well, giving me confidence that it will survive more than a few hiking seasons. The tread hasn’t noticeably worn down, and the abrasion-resistant heel and toe cap have proven durable so far. Although the mesh upper doesn’t offer the same level of toughness as leather, aside from a nice sheen of dirt, there’s no excessive wear. Once it’s past its lifespan, I can see myself purchasing the Merrell Moab Speed 2 again in the future.
There is a caveat to this shoe, however. While our low-top Speed 2 is holding up well, we’ve had some issues with the mid-height boot version, which shares the same construction as the low-top but with more ankle protection. After 50 miles of use in the rocky, sandy desert environment of the Grand Canyon, parts of the Speed 2 Mid’s exposed midsole foam are tearing off, and the suede overlays on the side are pilling. Given their similarities, this raises some concerns about the longevity of the low-top Speed 2.
The Speed 2 offers average foot protection for a lighter-weight hiking shoe. While it has more armor than most trail runners, it’s not as burly as Merrell’s popular—and burlier—Moab 3. This shoe is designed with a TPU toe cap that can dull the pain when you stub a toe, but the TPU isn’t as protective as a rubber toe cap. The heel also has the same TPU reinforcement, and the ankle is only lightly protected by padding. That said, the Speed 2’s cushioned midsole and midfoot plate readily handle anything sharp underfoot—I barely notice what’s beneath my feet when I hike. This excellent underfoot protection also helps reduce foot fatigue during long outings.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
The Speed 2 offers an impressive blend of comfort and support for a shoe that weighs only 1 pound 3.4 ounces (in the women's non-waterproof version). For reference, that’s only an ounce or so heavier than a popular trail runner like the Hoka Speedgoat. And it’s closely in line with other popular lightweight shoes like the Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX (1 lb. 8.8 oz.) and Salomon’s X Ultra 5 (1 lb. 6.6 oz.). The only knock that we have in relation to weight with the Moab Speed is that its wide base and thick midsole give it a somewhat clunky feel on the trail. This isn’t a rock-hopping and break-out-into-a-run kind of design. But as long as you’re looking for a hiking shoe (rather than a trail runner), the Moab Speed 2 won’t hold you back.
Waterproof Liner
The Moab Speed 2 low-top shoe is offered with a waterproof Gore-Tex liner for $170, but I opted for the non-waterproof version ($140) for the mid-summer conditions I anticipated in Colorado, Utah, and Arizona. It proved to be a great decision: In these conditions, with temps reaching the mid-80s on one day on the Colorado Trail, the Speed 2’s mesh upper offered excellent breathability—it’s a much better venter than a leather design or a shoe with a waterproof liner.
The Merrell Moab Speed 2 in a women’s 7.5 fits my size 7.5 to 8 feet wonderfully. As someone with flat feet and low arches, I usually gravitate towards hiking shoes with minimal arch support, whether zero-drop or highly cushioned designs, and many models tend to be too narrow and uncomfortable for me. However, the Speed 2 didn’t present that issue—its toe box is roomy enough to accommodate my wide feet, the fit around the arch is snug and secure without any excess pressure, and the heel is comfortably padded and doesn’t slip. Other Better Trail testers have noted the roomy fit can be an issue for those with narrow feet, but it worked very well for me.
Merrell Moab 3 Waterproof ($160): The Traditional Best-Seller
The Speed’s more traditional sibling, the Moab 3, is widely loved for its sturdy, comfortable, and durable build. With a leather upper, rubber heel and toe caps, and thick Vibram TC5+ outsole, it’s sturdier, more durable, and offers more protection on all sides. It’s also $10 cheaper. In contrast, the Speed 2 feels more athletic, with a lighter, more breathable, and rockered design, and it has a more modern overall look. Both are supportive and comfortable shoes from one of the most popular names in hiking footwear, and your final decision will come down to personal preference and speed. For more, read our Merrell Moab 3 review.
Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX ($170): Stable and Tough
The Salomon X Ultra 5 is designed for control and precision, featuring a stiff chassis, a secure lacing system, and a snug, low-volume fit that excels on technical trails and under the weight of a pack. It’s a shoe that feels planted on uneven terrain, offering standout support and protection for rugged day hikes or lightweight backpacking. Compared to the Merrell Moab Speed 2, the X Ultra is noticeably firmer and more locked-in, while the Merrell prioritizes step-in comfort and a softer, roomier feel that’s better suited to casual hikers or moderate trails. For a deeper dive, see our X Ultra 5 review.
Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX ($180): More Cushion, Less Agility
The Merrell Moab Speed 2 and Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX both aim to strike a balance between hiking support and trail-running comfort, but they prioritize different strengths. The Anacapa 2 offers plush cushioning and a smooth, rockered stride that excels on well-maintained trails—perfect for hikers prone to sore feet or logging long miles on easier terrain. The Moab Speed 2, by contrast, is more agile and better suited to varied terrain, with a firmer ride, better precision, and a more trail-ready outsole. For all-day comfort on mellow trails, opt for the Hoka; for versatility and technical capability, stick with Merrell. For more information, read our Anacapa 2 Low review.
An approachable design, the Moab Speed 2 combines hiking-shoe-like stability and support with the low weight and rockered style of a trail running shoe. It's comfortable out of the box and adept both on and off-trail. However, it lacks the performance fit and agility you’d get with a trail runner.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Merrell’s traditional hiking shoe features plush padding for comfort, a durable and protective leather upper, and a stiff build that can easily forge its way through most terrain. It’ll last significantly longer than most lightweight synthetic hiking shoes. However, it’s too heavy and clunky for many modern hikers.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Salomon’s popular lightweight hiker offers a nice balance of agility, protection, and durability for everything from easy trails to cross-country travel. It’s not as soft and cushioned as a trail runner, and the fit runs narrow, but it’s otherwise a top all-around performer.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Merrell’s Moab Speed 2 has become one of our go-to shoe recommendations for individuals seeking a modern, lightweight design for everything from long, single-day outings to overnight trips. Stability and comfort are its two standout features, and this shoe generally feels great on your feet. We’d confidently take this shoe out on rugged hikes, and it’s stylish enough for post-hike wandering around town—always a nice bonus. We find its price well worth the spend, though we’d still keep an eye on this shoe’s longevity based on our disappointing experience with the Speed 2 Mid. That said, Merrell recently released a new variation of the Speed 2 with a leather upper, which very well might address the durability complaint… Sounds like we have some more gear to test.
it's trail o'clock
Gear Guide
Best Hiking Boots of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Pants of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Daypacks of 2026Gear Guide
Best Trekking Poles of 2026Gear Guide
Best Synthetic Insulated Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Rain Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Fleece Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Down Jackets of 2026curated for you