Table of contents
Hiking footwear decisions come down to personal preference. Many on the Better Trail team prefer the low weight and cushion of a trail running shoe, while others are drawn to the confidence-inspiring stiffness of leather designs. In between are lightweight hiking shoes that let you move quickly and athletically without compromising support. We’ve included the full gamut in our extensive testing, and you can find our takeaways below. To best match the options to your needs, use our sort-by function to prioritize hiking shoes based on our in-house ratings for comfort, support, traction, durability, weight, and more.
Hiking Shoe Superlatives
Merrell Moab Speed 2 GTX ($175)
Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX ($180)
Scarpa Rush 2 Pro GTX ($189)
La Sportiva Prodigio Max ($185)
Merrell Moab 3 Waterproof ($160)
Altra Lone Peak 9 ($145)
La Sportiva TX4 Evo ($189)
Our Hiking Shoe Picks
An approachable design, the Moab Speed 2 combines hiking-shoe-like stability and support with the low weight and rockered style of a trail running shoe. It's comfortable out of the box and adept both on and off-trail. However, it lacks the performance fit and agility you’d get with a trail runner.
An approachable design, the Moab Speed 2 combines hiking-shoe-like stability and support with the low weight and rockered style of a trail running shoe. It's comfortable out of the box and adept both on and off-trail. However, it lacks the performance fit and agility you’d get with a trail runner.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 8.7 oz.
Waterproof
No (WP available)
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
Vibram TC5+
Pros
Cons
For those looking for a middle ground between a nimble trail runner and a stiff, supportive hiking shoe, the Merrell Moab Speed 2 is one of our top recommendations. This shoe is as approachable as it gets: It’s comfortable and requires no break-in period, is decently breathable for a waterproof design, grips rock, mud, dirt, and snow securely, and offers a noticeable amount of stability for its low weight. It’s quickly become our go-to shoe for almost every adventure: We’ve worn the Moab Speed 2 everywhere from the Weminuche Wilderness to Moab, Utah, to Mt. Humphreys (the highest point in Arizona) while hiking and backpacking, moving fast on easy ground and picking our way slowly through complex terrain.
The Merrell Moab Speed 2 is a modernized version of the brand's popular and longstanding Moab. Despite the fresh look, Merrell didn’t stray too far from the original in terms of stability—the Speed is exceptionally supportive underfoot, thanks to a stiffening Flexplate and a decently burly heel counter. It does sacrifice some protection and durability due to its synthetic upper and small toe cap, but the added rocker and plush cushioning enhance walkability and comfort. To be clear, the Speed should not be confused with a trail running shoe—it’s a bit clunky, and the roomy fit lacks true performance chops. However, for those seeking a nimble and lightweight hiking shoe, it’s an excellent all-rounder. For more, read our review of the Merrell Moab Speed 2.
A burly, leather hiking shoe that feels like an approach shoe with a bounce in its step, the Rush 2 Pro GTX brings serious stability and protection to technical terrain. It’s overkill for summer conditions and casual trails, but a standout choice if your hikes regularly drift into off-trail terrain.
A burly, leather hiking shoe that feels like an approach shoe with a bounce in its step, the Rush 2 Pro GTX brings serious stability and protection to technical terrain. It’s overkill for summer conditions and casual trails, but a standout choice if your hikes regularly drift into off-trail terrain.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 7.2 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Leather
Outsole
Presa HIK-01
Pros
Cons
Scarpa has a long reputation for building mountain-ready footwear, and the Rush 2 Pro GTX feels like a modern extension of that heritage. Somewhere in between a hiking shoe, a trail running shoe, and an approach shoe, the Rush blends a durable nubuck leather upper with a stable, supportive chassis, a grippy PRESA outsole, and a moderately cushioned midsole. Its hybrid personality makes it feel protective and planted on rough terrain, while still maintaining enough flexibility and comfort for longer days on established trails.
We tested the Rush 2 Pro GTX over roughly 80 miles across Colorado and Utah, including rocky alpine trails, desert scrambles, and tight slot canyons where the uppers were constantly grinding against sandstone. It handled everything with confidence, offering excellent stability while boulder hopping, reliable traction on sandy rock and loose terrain, and impressive durability with little visible wear afterward. And the shoe did it all in comfort, which is a rare balance to find for such technical capability.
For hikers who spend most of their time on smooth trails, the Rush 2 Pro GTX is likely more shoe than necessary. And in our experience, the nubuck upper and Gore-Tex build cause it to run warm, making it less ideal for hot, dry summer conditions. But if your hikes regularly push into cooler weather, snow, or rugged terrain, it’s one of the most capable and confidence-inspiring options out there. For more, read our Scarpa Rush 2 Pro GTX review.
The Anacapa offers the plush cushion of a running shoe, alongside the stability, protection, and durability of a hiking shoe. It's a great option for hikers who regularly experience foot fatigue or log high-mileage days. However, the wide platform lacks precision on technical terrain and the large sections of exposed foam can break down over time.
The Anacapa offers the plush cushion of a running shoe, alongside the stability, protection, and durability of a hiking shoe. It's a great option for hikers who regularly experience foot fatigue or log high-mileage days. However, the wide platform lacks precision on technical terrain and the large sections of exposed foam can break down over time.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 8.8 oz.
Waterproof
Yes (non-WP available)
Upper
Leather/synthetic
Outsole
Vibram Megagrip
Pros
Cons
Hoka’s max-cushioned running shoes are an undisputed favorite amongst road and trail runners, known for their plush comfort and leg-saving shock absorption. The brand applies the same philosophy to its lineup of hiking shoes, including the Anacapa 2 Low GTX. The Anacapa features thick underfoot cushioning and a rockered sole but adds hiking chops with a partially leather upper, Vibram Megagrip outsole, and solid toe protection. It’s also surprisingly stable, thanks to a relatively stiff midsole (much more reminiscent of a hiking shoe than a trail runner) and a wide platform that minimizes ankle rolls.
The Anacapa 2 Low GTX is a great choice for hikers prone to foot fatigue; we’ve also found them to be easy to break in, with none of the hot spots or blisters that often accompany a new leather shoe. However, the design shows its weakness on technical, off-camber terrain—the large footprint is imprecise when navigating rocks and roots, and the traction isn’t as secure as what you get from an approach or technical hiking shoe. There’s also a lot of exposed foam on the outsole (a weight-saving tactic), which is more prone to wearing away than a full rubber outsole. But if you stick to established trails, the Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX offers incredible comfort and stability. For more, see our review of the Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX.
The endurance champ of the Prodigio series, the Max is built for all-day (or multi-day) comfort and durability. Designed as a long-distance trail runner, it also makes for an excellent hiking shoe for long days, fast pushes, on- and off-trail terrain.
The endurance champ of the Prodigio series, the Max is built for all-day (or multi-day) comfort and durability. Designed as a long-distance trail runner, it also makes for an excellent hiking shoe for long days, fast pushes, on- and off-trail terrain.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 4.8 oz.
Waterproof
No
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
FriXion XT 2.0 (Red)
Pros
Cons
The La Sportiva Prodigio Max represents a new chapter in the brand’s storied mountain-running lineage. Known for its minimalist, stiff, and narrow footwear, La Sportiva took a turn toward comfort with the Prodigio series—and nailed it. The Max’s supercritical EVA foam midsole feels energetic, plush, and bouncy—unlike anything the brand has made before—and the wide, planted toe box adds a stable, grounded feel with no hint of squirreliness. Put together, it’s an excellent long-distance and recovery trail runner that doubles as an equally capable, lightweight, and high-performance hiking shoe.
A long-time Hoka Speedgoat devotee, one of Better Trail’s founders, recently switched to the La Sportiva Prodigio Max and has not looked back: “It’s like La Sportiva took a Hoka and both made it more durable and gave it better traction.” Indeed, the tightly woven upper is impressively abrasion-resistant and keeps debris out, while the toe rand adds just enough protection from roots and rocks without feeling bulky. And unlike many trail runners that use exposed foam underfoot, the Prodigio Max features a full FriXion Red outsole for far greater longevity and traction on mixed terrain.
Of course, no shoe is perfect. The Prodigio Max’s tall 38-millimeter stack height requires some adjustment for those coming from low-profile shoes. The short lugs also limit traction in heavy mud or snow. Still, for hiking, backpacking, long-distance runs, or any day you want maximum comfort without sacrificing performance, the Prodigio Max is a true standout. For more, read our review of the Prodigio Max.
Merrell’s classic hiking shoe features plush padding for comfort, a durable and protective leather upper, and a stiff build that can easily forge its way through most terrain. It’ll last significantly longer than most lightweight synthetic hiking shoes. However, it’s too heavy and clunky for many modern hikers.
Merrell’s classic hiking shoe features plush padding for comfort, a durable and protective leather upper, and a stiff build that can easily forge its way through most terrain. It’ll last significantly longer than most lightweight synthetic hiking shoes. However, it’s too heavy and clunky for many modern hikers.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
2 lb. 2 oz.
Waterproof
Yes (non-WP available)
Upper
Leather
Outsole
Vibram TC5
Pros
Cons
The Merrell Moab is one of the most iconic hiking shoes ever to grace the trail. It’s neither modern nor lightweight, but there’s a reason this shoe is a best-seller: It’s comfortable out of the box with plush padding at the collar and tongue, has a solid, planted feel, offers tank-like protection against roots and rocks, and uses durable materials that will last longer than most synthetic alternatives. And in a world where many hiking shoes are approaching $200, the $160 price point is refreshing ($140 for the non-waterproof Moab).
Our tester was skeptical of the Moab before trying it, lumping it into the clunky “dad shoe” category (she tends to wear lightweight hiking shoes). But it didn't take long before she, too, had drunk the Kool-Aid, attesting, “The Moab is the kind of shoe you can put on and never think about again.” Compared to a lightweight design, it can forge through most terrain with aplomb, feels considerably more stable and protective, and will last hundreds of miles more.
To be sure, it’s heavier and stiffer than many modern-day hikers will prefer (you’ll probably be eager to take it off by the end of the day). Also, its Vibram TC5 rubber isn’t as grippy on rock as Vibram Megagrip—although it is more durable. If these are tradeoffs you’re willing to make, the Moab is a strong performer and an excellent value. For more, read our review of the Merrell Moab 3.
Salomon’s popular lightweight hiker offers a nice balance of agility, protection, and durability for everything from easy trails to cross-country travel. It’s not as soft and cushioned as a trail runner, and the fit runs narrow, but it’s otherwise a top all-around performer.
Salomon’s popular lightweight hiker offers a nice balance of agility, protection, and durability for everything from easy trails to cross-country travel. It’s not as soft and cushioned as a trail runner, and the fit runs narrow, but it’s otherwise a top all-around performer.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 10.8 oz.
Waterproof
Yes (non-WP available)
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
All Terrain Contagrip
Pros
Cons
Salomon doesn’t update its celebrated X Ultra line often, but it’s big news when it does. For 2025, we got the fifth iteration of the design, which has a serious following among hikers and backpackers thanks to its combination of above-average comfort, stability, and solid protection. The changes weren't revolutionary, but the new X Ultra 5 GTX features several notable tweaks: a more durable upper, a reshaped and more cushioned collar that addresses a pressure point from the previous generation, and minor changes to the lug shape of the Contagrip outsole. Many of the shoe’s signature design elements remain, including the Quicklace system (a love-it-or-hate-it feature) and a reasonably low weight.
After wearing the Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX under the weight of an overnight backpacking load, our tester came away impressed. This shoe is tough and very supportive, yet decently light, and its midsole strikes a nice middle ground between shock absorption and stability without resorting to an overly tall—and less stable—shape. The aggressive outsole’s deep lugs dig in nicely and are trustworthy in steep terrain, although it can’t quite match the stickiness of Vibram’s Megagrip compound found on alternatives like the Hoka Anacapa 2. In addition, the shoe leans more towards stability over the kind of cushy comfort you’ll find in a Hoka or trail running-inspired design. That said, the X Ultra 5’s midsole effectively isolates your feet from rocks and roots, and we didn’t experience any foot fatigue even after full trail days.
The biggest question mark with the X Ultra 5 is fit. Surprisingly, the toe box on the shoe is quite narrow, which diverges from the general industry trend toward high-volume shapes. The shoe worked fine on our tester’s moderately narrow foot, and the performance shape pays dividends in technical terrain where it’s easy to trust. However, some individuals may need to opt for the wide version or go up a half size to achieve their desired fit. Outside of that concern, the X Ultra 5 has proven to be a competent all-rounder. For more on this shoe, read our in-depth X Ultra 5 review.
Designed specifically for thru-hiking, the Topo Athletic Traverse offers an ideal combination of comfort, structure, and low weight. Most hikers will love the roomy toe box. Our tester put 650 miles into this shoe before noticing a performance drop.
Designed specifically for thru-hiking, the Topo Athletic Traverse offers an ideal combination of comfort, structure, and low weight. Most hikers will love the roomy toe box. Our tester put 650 miles into this shoe before noticing a performance drop.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 5.2 oz.
Waterproof
No
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
Vibram Megagrip
Pros
Cons
The Traverse is one of the rare shoes actually built for thru-hiking (most thru-hikers use repurposed trail runners), and Topo Athletic hit a home run with the design. In many ways, the Traverse looks like a trail running shoe, but there’s much more going on underneath the hood. Complementing its plush and flexible cushioning (“soft enough that I could feel what was underfoot”) is surprisingly good lateral support—our tester felt stable even loaded down with a 35-pound pack on uneven terrain, and cited the Traverse as one of the most trustworthy lightweight hiking shoes he’s ever used. When the cushion inevitably starts to break down, the Traverse has a rock plate to isolate the bottom of the foot from the trail.
While some trail shoes compromise traction for weight savings, the Topo Athletic Traverse’s outsole is impressively durable and grippy. The combination of sticky Vibram Megagrip rubber and a thoughtful lug pattern means they perform well in everything from wet and snowy conditions (which our tester encountered in Glacier National Park) to mud (in the Bob Marshall Wilderness) and even Class 3 scrambles (in the Pintlers). In his words, “The only places where you might want something else would be steep, technical terrain with small footholds and deep, slick mud, where you might want a shoe with deeper lugs.” And the Traverse is also exceptionally breathable and quick to drain and dry, which is what you want for warm-weather hiking.
All told, the Traverse strikes a nice balance of durability, performance, and weight savings for long pushes on the trail. Of course, it’s not the most stable or protective shoe, but this is a tradeoff most thru-hikers are willing to make for a lightweight design. Our Triple-Crowned tester has learned to expect 400 to 500 miles from his shoes, and the Traverse delivered 650 miles of comfort (he even pushed it for an additional 100 miles to a resupply, although at that point, the cushioning was worn out). And with a wide toe box, it’s a great alternative to the Altra Lone Peak for those who want extra space for swollen feet but aren’t interested in a zero-drop shoe. For more, read our review of the Topo Athletic Traverse.
Don’t be fooled by the modern aesthetic: The Free Hiker 2.0 is a highly supportive, grippy hiking shoe that can deftly tackle technical, off-camber terrain. But you don’t get extra padding or cushion, and the heavy, stiff build won’t appeal to everyone.
Don’t be fooled by the modern aesthetic: The Free Hiker 2.0 is a highly supportive, grippy hiking shoe that can deftly tackle technical, off-camber terrain. But you don’t get extra padding or cushion, and the heavy, stiff build won’t appeal to everyone.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 13 oz.
Waterproof
No (WP available)
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
Continental rubber
Pros
Cons
The Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2 Low has the streamlined look of a trail runner, but don’t be fooled— this is a hiking shoe through and through. The Free Hiker 2’s standout features are its stiff midsole and heel cup, which isolate the foot from the trail and provide a stable underfoot platform. Our tester described it as an agile monster truck: “It just rolls over everything in its path.” Completing the package is a durable synthetic upper (we anticipate it holding up for nearly as long as a leather alternative) and a Continental rubber outsole, which offers excellent grip on everything from damp dirt to slab and scree.
The Free Hiker 2.0 Low checks in at almost 2 pounds for the pair, placing it on the heavier side for a hiking shoe. The stiff heel cup is also a polarizing feature—it could potentially cause hot spots or blisters and doesn’t offer the same plush comfort we’ve come to expect from modern-day hiking shoes. And if you’re looking for a bouncy, cushioned shoe for high-mileage days on easy trails, this isn’t it. But taken together, the Free Hiker 2 Low’s ample support, protection, and grip make it a high-performance piece of footwear for those venturing into technical terrain—similar to an approach shoe but with better walkability (and worse climbability). Of all the shoes we’ve test-driven recently, it surprised and impressed us. For more, see our review of the Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2.0 GTX.
An approach shoe by design, the TX4 is protective, stable, and durable, and it offers particularly good traction on rock. The roomy toe box boosts comfort. However, the stiff design is not a great pairing for high-mileage days on established trails.
An approach shoe by design, the TX4 is protective, stable, and durable, and it offers particularly good traction on rock. The roomy toe box boosts comfort. However, the stiff design is not a great pairing for high-mileage days on established trails.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 12 oz.
Waterproof
No
Upper
Leather
Outsole
Vibram Megagrip
Pros
Cons
If your hikes take you into rocky terrain or you prefer a durable and protective leather hiking shoe, consider the La Sportiva TX4 Evo. The TX4 Evo is technically an approach shoe—a style of footwear designed for climbers that prioritizes traction on rock, thanks to a sticky rubber outsole and shallow lugs, and climbability, owing to a relatively stiff build and smooth patch of rubber underneath the big toe. The TX4 has been one of the most popular approach shoes for years running, and we’re huge fans: It’s the go-to for most climbers on Better Trail’s staff team, and our co-founder’s 70-plus-year-old parents have even adopted it as their hiking shoe of choice.
One of the standout features of the Sportiva TX4 Evo is its spacious forefoot, which provides excellent comfort for most users. The nubuck leather upper is also impressively durable; given that the newest “Evo” version is now resoleable, this shoe can log more miles in its lifetime than almost any other hiking shoe. And while the TX4 Evo isn’t technically waterproof, you can boost its water resistance with an aftermarket waterproofing spray or wax, which works well for adventures that take you across snow or shallow streams.
But the TX4 Evo isn’t for everyone: Its stiff build isn’t comfortable for high-mileage days, and it's worth noting that the "Evo" is noticeably stiffer (even after being broken in) than the previous version. Additionally, the TX4 Evo is heavier than most hiking shoes, and those with narrow feet will find it far too roomy in the forefoot (these folks will be better suited with the TX Guide). As a result, we don’t recommend it for most hikers, especially those who want to move light and fast on smooth trails. But as a durable and protective option for hikers who spend a lot of time above treeline, it doesn’t get much better. For more, read our review of the TX4 Evo.
The Apex flips everything you know about the long-standing Targhee line on its head, with a low weight, modern look, and springy midsole. Its signature wide toe box will be a welcome sight for Targhee loyalists, though it can’t come close to the original’s toughness and protection.
The Apex flips everything you know about the long-standing Targhee line on its head, with a low weight, modern look, and springy midsole. Its signature wide toe box will be a welcome sight for Targhee loyalists, though it can’t come close to the original’s toughness and protection.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 8 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
Keen.All-Terrain
Pros
Cons
If you’re an omnivorous hiker who likes a healthy mix of singletrack strolls, steep trails, and backpacking trips, the new Targhee Apex Waterproof might suit your sensibilities. Its balanced design cribs the best aspects of lighter trail runners and heavier shoes alike, without falling into the “good at many things, great at nothing” trap. Key to that performance is an impressive amount of support and stability for such a light shoe (more on this below). While hiking up to Steliko Lookout in Washington State, our tester applauded the Targhee Apex’s steadiness under a 30-pound pack. A shank helps achieve that feel, as does a midfoot wrap that extends up from the midsole.
The springy, nicely cushioned midsole helps prevent the Targhee Apex from feeling too clunky, aided by the shoe’s low weight (just 1.5 pounds). And, despite not exactly coming across as a burly shoe, it delivers a welcome level of protection due to a hefty toe bumper, a pronounced heel counter, and the aforementioned shank and midfoot wrap (that said, it’s still a world away from the thick leather used on the standard Targhee IV). Traction is also a highlight—surprisingly so, given that the shoe doesn’t have a Vibram outsole, and that Keen, unlike competing footwear brands such as La Sportiva and Salomon, isn’t known for its rubber compounds. Nonetheless, our tester found that the Targhee Apex and its multidirectional lugs held fast to muddy, steep, root-strewn trails on the Washington coast.
With a spacious toe box even in its regular version (it also comes in a wide model) and its dialed midsole foam, the Targhee Apex hits the right comfort notes without feeling too sloppy or wobbly. The only real misses our tester noted were the laces, which feel cheap, and the flat insole, which isn’t up to the bar set by the rest of the shoe. That bar is pretty high, making the Targhee Apex feel like a trail shoe that few generalist hikers will be able to find fault with. For more, read our review of the Targhee Apex Waterproof.
La Sportiva Frankensteined the Prodigio Hike with a knit cuff upper and a rockered, trail runner-like base. The result is impressive on- and off-trail performance, although its fit is polarizing and the price is fairly steep.
La Sportiva Frankensteined the Prodigio Hike with a knit cuff upper and a rockered, trail runner-like base. The result is impressive on- and off-trail performance, although its fit is polarizing and the price is fairly steep.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 10.5 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
FriXion XT 2.0
Pros
Cons
The La Sportiva Prodigio Hike GTX is a unique beast, blending traits of a lightweight trail runner with the support and traction of a hiking boot. Our tester found the fit dialed from the start, thanks in part to a sock-like knit collar that hugged the ankle and kept out trail debris. Despite its flexible feel and airy upper, the Prodigio surprised with its confidence-inspiring stability—even when carrying a 30-pound pack across varied terrain in Rocky Mountain National Park. The shoe’s design allows for natural foot movement, and there were no hot spots or discomfort during high-mileage days, even with minimal break-in. The Gore-Tex ePE liner kept our feet dry in snow and slushy conditions, and the breathable mesh upper helped prevent overheating.
Traction was another standout feature. The Prodigio’s FriXion XT 2.0 rubber sole—borrowed from La Sportiva’s climbing and approach shoe DNA—provided reliable grip on everything from icy boulders to slick sandstone, delivering close-to-approach-shoe performance without the stiffness or heat. While it’s not the most armored shoe out there, our tester still appreciated the well-placed toe and heel protection and the shoe’s ability to take the edge off sharp impacts underfoot. Though it lacks a rock plate, the cushioning felt stable, not soft or squishy, and proved supportive enough for light backpacking loads.
Fit, however, is where buyers should tread carefully. The Prodigio runs small—our tester had to size up a full size—and the vertical space in the forefoot may feel tight for those with high-volume feet. The heavily rockered sole also took some getting used to. Still, with a 1-pound 10.5-ounce weight and thoughtful design touches throughout, the Prodigio Hike GTX earns its relatively steep price tag. It’s a capable hybrid for hikers and backpackers who want an agile, well-cushioned shoe that doesn’t shy away from technical terrain. Just be sure to try it on before you commit. To learn more, read our full review of the Prodigio Hike GTX.
A lightweight build, wide toe box, and flat, slipper-like feel make the Lone Peak popular amongst high-mileage hikers. However, it can feel sloppy and imprecise on off-camber terrain and lacks the plush cushioning of competitors.
A lightweight build, wide toe box, and flat, slipper-like feel make the Lone Peak popular amongst high-mileage hikers. However, it can feel sloppy and imprecise on off-camber terrain and lacks the plush cushioning of competitors.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 6.3 oz.
Waterproof
No (WP available)
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
MaxTrac
Pros
Cons
The Altra Lone Peak is a trail staple, particularly among thru-hikers who frequently log 20-plus-mile days. Long-trail aficionados love it for its slipper-like comfort: The Lone Peak features a lightweight, zero-drop design, an extra wide toe box, and a low-slung stack height of just 25 millimeters (for comparison’s sake, the Speedgoat’s is 37mm), which gives you a close-to-the-ground, barefoot feel. Altra also tacked on a rock plate, dubbed the “Stoneguard,” for added protection underfoot, and ports at the shoe’s arch help it drain quickly after a proper dousing. Durability hasn’t historically been a strong suit of the Lone Peak, but the latest version aims to address this with a seamless upper and an updated MaxTrac outsole (the outsole also impressed us with its improved traction). Added up, it’s an ideal design for swollen feet, folks with bunions, and those prone to blisters—we consistently recommend the Lone Peak to friends who have struck out with other hiking shoes, and we’ve yet to lead anyone astray.
Five years ago, it would have been considered heretical to challenge the Altra Lone Peak, but a recent rush of competition has exposed the shoe’s shortcomings. For one, being dubbed the slipper of trail shoes isn’t necessarily a compliment—the Lone Peak feels sloppy and imprecise on off-camber terrain, narrow feet will swim in its roomy toe box, and the minimal cushion can cause foot fatigue. It also lacks the stability necessary for rugged trails and cross-country travel: After bailing off a stormy ridgeline in the La Plata Mountains, our tester slipped and fumbled down steep and loose talus—terrain that her Topo Athletic shoes would have handled with ease. But if you stick to easy trails and don’t mind the roomy toe box and zero drop, the Lone Peak can be a true foot-saver.
Traction and durability are highlights of this modern-day hiking shoe, built to tackle challenging mountain terrain. The 02 has more cushioning than the first iteration yet is still more stable than most trail running shoes. However, the tightly woven upper decreases breathability.
Traction and durability are highlights of this modern-day hiking shoe, built to tackle challenging mountain terrain. The 02 has more cushioning than the first iteration yet is still more stable than most trail running shoes. However, the tightly woven upper decreases breathability.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 5.4 oz.
Waterproof
No
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
Vibram Megagrip Lightbase
Pros
Cons
Founded by the undisputed GOAT of mountain running, Killian Journet, NNormal is a small and scrappy footwear brand with two offerings: the minimalist Kjerag and the versatile Tomir 02. Behind everything NNormal does is the belief that durable products are sustainable products—the longer you can keep a shoe on the trail and out of the landfill, the smaller its overall footprint. Thus, one of the Tomir 02’s standout features is its longevity. While most hikers retire lightweight hiking shoes after 300 to 400 miles, the Tomir 02 (which features a Matryx upper with Kevlar) can go 600 and beyond.
The NNormal Tomir 02 features a healthy dose of cushioning, which is slightly firmer than that of most trail running shoes and thus less squirrely on off-camber terrain. The Vibram Megagrip Lightbase outsole and thoughtfully shaped lugs offer impressive traction on rock, dirt, and even snow—while navigating granite slabs, our tester found the Tomir 02’s grip to be on par with that of an approach shoe. And while the Tomir is expensive, if you factor in its lifespan, you’ll likely save money in the long run. All told, the Tomir 02 is an ideal trail-runner-meets-hiking shoe design, more purpose-built for stability and durability than most competing models, and suitable for both on- and off-trail travel. A note on fit: Multiple testers have found that the Tomir 02 runs slightly large, so you might want to consider sizing down a half size.
The self-proclaimed GOAT of trail running shoes, the Speedgoat has massive appeal amongst the fast-and-light hiking crowd. The update to the "7" represents a notable improvement from the "6," with responsive supercritical EVA foam and a much more comfortable and secure fit.
The self-proclaimed GOAT of trail running shoes, the Speedgoat has massive appeal amongst the fast-and-light hiking crowd. The update to the "7" represents a notable improvement from the "6," with responsive supercritical EVA foam and a much more comfortable and secure fit.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 3.4 oz.
Waterproof
No
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
Vibram Megagrip
Pros
Cons
The Hoka Speedgoat is one of the most popular trail shoes of all time, highly acclaimed by both trail runners and hikers. There’s much to love about the Speedgoat: Its lightweight and airy design won’t hold you back on high-mileage days, the cushioned midsole helps reduce foot and leg fatigue, and comfort is stellar compared to a stiff hiking boot. For years, we’ve relied on this shoe to do it all, whether we’re out for the day with a running vest or on a week-long backpacking trip in the high country.
We’ll admit, the Speedgoat 6 was a letdown. The short, unpadded tongue created a pressure point under the laces, and durability across the upper, outsole, and midsole left us wanting more. But the Speedgoat 7 feels like a proper rebound. In testing, we’ve appreciated the more supportive yet lively midsole that seems to resist packing out much better than the previous iteration, the added comfort from light tongue padding, and improved upper durability thanks to more welded overlays. The outsole is also a step in the right direction, with increased Vibram Megagrip coverage—but we still wish Hoka would commit to a full rubber outsole, as many brands now do to help push longevity past the 500-mile mark.
If you’ve got your eye on the Speedgoat, it’s a fun, nimble ride—just go in with a clear understanding of what it is. Compared to more grounded, stable hiking shoes, it can feel a bit squirrely underfoot. The plush foam and tall 37mm heel stack put you higher off the ground, which isn’t ideal for technical, rocky, or off-trail terrain (that said, we know plenty of runners still take it into rougher environments without hesitation). But for those prioritizing a lightweight, nimble feel—especially on long days on established trails—the Speedgoat 7 is a strong pick. For more, read our Speedgoat 7 review.
The Ultra 112 WP’s rigid structure lets you tackle all kinds of routes—trail or not—and its burly exterior should hold up for hundreds of miles. Still, its hefty feel will be a turnoff for some, and we experienced several fit and durability issues with the heel.
The Ultra 112 WP’s rigid structure lets you tackle all kinds of routes—trail or not—and its burly exterior should hold up for hundreds of miles. Still, its hefty feel will be a turnoff for some, and we experienced several fit and durability issues with the heel.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 15.7 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Leather/synthetic
Outsole
Surface CTRL rubber
Pros
Cons
The latest in The North Face’s line of traditionally structured, sturdy hiking shoes, the Ultra 112 WP is built to handle all kinds of terrain. Its stiff rubber outsole and shank offer plenty of underfoot support on ungroomed or rutted trails, as well as during rocky cross-country travel. It also had enough grip to keep us firmly planted while doing some light scrambling in Joshua Tree National Park and hiking on muddy, wet trails (thanks to tall 5 mm lugs). And with a generous rubber toe cap and burly leather overlays, you’re protected from impacts from multiple angles.
Comfort was more of a mixed bag. Overall, the Ultra 112 WP has a minimal break-in period, and the EVA midsole provides modest cushioning without feeling overly disconnected from the ground. Where our tester ran into issues was with the overly wide heel: His average-width foot never felt fully locked in, and the lacing system was no help. He experienced slippage on steep terrain, causing hot spots and blisters. While the rest of the shoe showed minimal wear over about 100 miles of use, he wore through the liner and padding in the heel, leaving a quarter-sized crater.
And then there’s the matter of weight. At nearly 2 pounds, it’s one of the heavier hiking shoes available. While our tester didn’t report foot fatigue even after long, 10+ mile days in the mountains, it’s too heavy for fast-and-light objectives or easy hiking on well-established trails, where a lighter and more nimble shoe will simply be more fun. Still, the Ultra 112 WP is designed to take you just about anywhere, regardless of terrain—as long as it fits you well. For more, read our review of the Ultra 112 WP.
The Trail 2650 is stylish hiking shoe at home both on and off the trail. The stiff polyurethane shank, toe and heel reinforcements, and durable suede upper offer more protection, stability, and durability than expected from a shoe of this weight. However, our tester experienced a long break-in period and issues with fit.
The Trail 2650 is stylish hiking shoe at home both on and off the trail. The stiff polyurethane shank, toe and heel reinforcements, and durable suede upper offer more protection, stability, and durability than expected from a shoe of this weight. However, our tester experienced a long break-in period and issues with fit.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 8 oz.
Waterproof
No (WP available)
Upper
Leather
Outsole
Vibram Megagrip
Pros
Cons
Hiking shoes don’t always get high marks for style, but the Danner Trail 2650 bucks the trend with a sleek suede design that’s available in a variety of trendy colorways. It’s not just easy on the eyes: This shoe delivers impressive stability and protection for a relatively low weight, making it a great choice for backpackers or day hikers looking for a step up from a trail runner. In contrast to more minimalist shoes, the Danner Trail 2650 features a stiff thermoplastic polyurethane shank and heel reinforcement, a hefty rubber toe cap to guard against toe stubs, and a thick suede upper that noticeably isolates the foot. We’re also big fans of the Vibram Megagrip rubber outsole, which is impressively tacky on rock (however, the shallow lugs aren’t ideal for soft terrain like mud and wet leaves).
The downside to this robust construction is break-in time: Out of the box, the Danner Trail 2650 is uncomfortable and stiff, with very little give underfoot. The shoe loosens up after about three wears, allowing the sturdy foam and cushy OrthoLite footbed to shine in terms of support and comfort. However, despite having a more stable construction than lightweight shoes like the Moab Speed 2 or Hoka Speedgoat 7, issues with fit might undermine the shoe’s prowess on technical terrain—our tester was unable to achieve a good lock with the laces. But for a stylish and protective hiking shoe with a long lifespan, the Danner Trail 2650 is a great choice. For warm-weather hiking, check out the Trail 2650 Campo; for wet conditions, Danner offers a Gore-Tex version of the Trail 2650. For more, read our review of the Danner Trail 2650.
Compare Hiking Shoes
An approachable design, the Moab Speed 2 combines hiking-shoe-like stability and support with the low weight and rockered style of a trail running shoe. It's comfortable out of the box and adept both on and off-trail. However, it lacks the performance fit and agility you’d get with a trail runner.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
A burly, leather hiking shoe that feels like an approach shoe with a bounce in its step, the Rush 2 Pro GTX brings serious stability and protection to technical terrain. It’s overkill for summer conditions and casual trails, but a standout choice if your hikes regularly drift into off-trail terrain.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
The Anacapa offers the plush cushion of a running shoe, alongside the stability, protection, and durability of a hiking shoe. It's a great option for hikers who regularly experience foot fatigue or log high-mileage days. However, the wide platform lacks precision on technical terrain and the large sections of exposed foam can break down over time.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Our Testing and Team
You can only glean a small amount of information by reading the specs of a hiking shoe, and that’s why we put serious miles on every pair we test. Every product we cover gets the full trail treatment, where we log our insights on comfort, stability, durability, and more. And because hiking footwear is so fit-specific, we’ve put significant effort into detailing each shoe's shape and who it’s best for. To do this effectively and draw comparisons among top designs requires a lot of know-how, and with four decades of gear reviewing experience among our founding team and a dedicated crew of gear testers, we have just that. So far, the Better Trail team has fully reviewed 23 hiking shoes, and our team’s collective testing experience spans tens of thousands of on- and off-trail miles and over 200 pairs of footwear.
Highlights from Better Trail’s hiking shoe testing:
- Ultralight backpacker Jade Downing put the La Sportiva Prodigio Hike GTX through a wide-ranging, multi-state test, using the hybrid shoe/boot for everything from alpine scrambling and backpacking in Colorado to late-fall desert missions in Utah and beyond.
- The Topo Traverse is marketed as a technical shoe for thru-hikers, so we put it to the test with ultralight backpacker Alex Droubay during his hike of the Continental Divide Trail. Impressively, the pair held up for roughly 650 miles of hard use before needing replacement.
- In search of the ideal trail running/hiking shoe hybrid, Four Corners’ based Cassie Panther put the Salomon XA Pro 3D and Altra Timp through the wringer.
- The La Sportiva Prodigio Max struck a chord with Better Trail Co-Founder David Wilkinson, who, after a backpacking trip in the Weminuche Wilderness, described it as offering a “Goldilocks combination of comfort and support.”
- Hiker and experienced trail runner Jonas Hill put upstart footwear brand NNormal’s Tomir 02 through its paces in an extensive test in Europe. Top locations included Spain’s Picos de Europa and the challenging terrain of Norway’s Lofoten Islands.
Our Ratings Explained
Our overall rating considers the product’s complete picture, encompassing price, build quality, performance (based on its intended use), durability, and other key factors. At the high end of the rating scale are standout hiking shoes that offer something special, whether they’re the crème de la crème or budget designs that offer a savvy combination of features for the price. If you ask us, most readers should look for a hiking shoe with an above-average overall rating—there’s little reason not to. That said, hiking shoes with lower overall ratings are still notable enough to have made our list; for various reasons, these might be compelling options for users with specific design preferences or those who get out only a few times a year.
Comfort is one of the most important factors when finding the proper hiking footwear—it doesn’t matter how grippy or protective a shoe is if you can’t wear it. That said, comfort is a subjective metric and often comes down to fit and personal preferences. In our write-ups above, we provide information on sizing and fit (including if a shoe runs narrow or wide, is small for the size, etc.); however, we don’t factor it into our comfort rating unless there are universal complaints.
For our scale, we gave careful consideration to what makes a shoe universally comfortable. In the end, it all comes down to this question: Do you want to keep the shoe on when you arrive at camp (or in the car), or do you think about taking it off right away? Those with plush cushion, a flexible midsole and outsole, and a light feel rank high, while stiff, firm, and heavy shoes get a lower score. These rankings aren’t impartial—we’re implying that we think a lighter, plusher, and more flexible shoe is more comfortable. You might disagree, especially if you spend a lot of time hiking off-trail. For this reason, it’s not bad if a shoe scores a 3 or 4 on our comfort scale—just more information to help guide your decision.
Extremely comfortable, with a plush upper, soft midsole cushioning, flexible outsole, and low weight.
Average comfort. Often stiff and lacking in cushion. May require a long break-in time.
Not comfortable and likely not a great choice for hiking.
One of the primary reasons to opt for a hiking shoe over, say, a Chuck Taylor, is for additional structure. While you don’t necessarily need much support and stability for short walks on pavement, it’s imperative for long days on off-camber terrain. Rather than conforming to every obstacle on the trail, a stable shoe employs several strategies—including a shank, external frame, polyurethane plate underfoot, or heel counter—to offer a solid platform and hold your foot steady around the sides and top. Ultimately, the shoe should do the work of navigating the contours of the trail—not your foot. This helps prevent foot fatigue and ankle rolls and instills confidence while forging through difficult terrain.
If you spend much of your time on rugged trails or cross-country terrain (traversing scree slopes, kicking steps in snow, navigating boulder fields, etc.), you’ll likely want a shoe that ranks high for stability and support (or consider a full-on hiking boot). These are generally our top choice for older or less experienced hikers as well. On the other hand, shoes that score lower on our support and stability scale are lighter, more flexible, and more responsive. If you hike on smooth surfaces, are quick and nimble on technical terrain, or aim for big-mileage days, a less structured shoe will be the best match. And, like many things, this ultimately comes down to personal preference.
Excellent stability and support, thanks to stiff materials and firm cushioning. Ideal for off-trail, cross-country travel. At the lower end of this range are shoes with an ideal combination of structure and flexibility for the majority of trails and even some off-trail terrain.
Average stability and support. Most trail running / hiking shoe hybrids fit into this category. Look for plush cushioning and flexible outsoles and uppers. Should be kept on established trails.
Sub-par stability and support. Most trail runners land here. Will feel maxed out on technical trail or if you’re wearing a heavy pack.
The traction style of a hiking shoe largely depends on the type of rubber, lug pattern, and lug depth. Hiking shoes with tall, well-spaced lugs, for example, excel on wet and loose terrain, such as mud, leaves, and snow. On the other hand, hiking shoes with particularly grippy rubber and smoother lugs (like those on the La Sportiva Bushido III, for example) are better suited for rock. Finally, some hiking shoes deliver impressive all-around performance with thoughtful lug patterning—these are our top picks for trails that feature a combination of rocks, roots, dirt, mud, snow, and more. If you frequent easier trails or hike exclusively on one sort of terrain, you can get away with a shoe that scores lower on our traction score, but from our personal experience, aiming for an above-average traction rating will lead to the most enjoyable hiking experience.
Excellent traction on all types of terrain, from rocks and roots to mud, snow, and wet leaves. Vibram Megagrip is a top performer.
Average traction. You might find yourself lacking confidence on rock or wet terrain.
Below-average traction. Not recommended for hiking.
A hiking shoe’s ability to hold up to heavy wear is a function of its upper materials, outsole rubber, and overall build quality. Generally speaking, leather hiking shoes are more durable than those with synthetic uppers, although modern materials like Kevlar (as seen on the NNormal Tomir 02) are impressive in their abrasion resistance. Regarding outsoles, rubber ranges from ultra-sticky to ultra-durable, and the grippiest shoes aren’t always the longest-lasting. We’ve also started to see more shoes built with an eye toward resoling, which is a fun feature as long as the upper is sure to last.
We strongly recommend shoes that rate high on our durability scale. With all the buzz around sustainability, one of the best decisions you can make is to buy gear that lasts (and thus stays out of the landfill). The good news is, it’s also kinder on your wallet. However, it’s worth noting that durable shoes are often heavier, which may not be ideal for weight-conscious hikers. We know many PCT thru-hikers who have chosen to go through six or seven lightweight hiking shoes rather than save money with two or three heavier designs.
Excellent durability, thanks to a burly leather or Kevlar upper, top-notch build quality, and long-lasting rubber outsole. Look for resoleable designs—these can last between 500 and 800 miles.
Average durability due to lightweight and flexible materials—good for 300 to 500 miles.
Poor durability; not a great value if you want a shoe to last you longer than a few multi-day trips.
Hikers’ needs vary when it comes to foot protection—some are willing to hike in minimalist FiveFingers (or even sandals), while others prefer a burly upper that isolates their feet from the elements. Most hikers will want some level of protection against stubbed toes, sharp rocks and roots, and errant trekking-pole plants. The most protective hiking shoes feature generous rubber rands, burly toe caps, solid heel protection, thick rubber uppers, and rock plates or thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) inserts under the foot; shoes with thinner uppers and fewer reinforcements are lower on the protection scale. While foot protection is a matter of personal preference, we like to match our shoes to the type of terrain we’re traveling: For cross-country travel and particularly difficult trails, we prefer a shoe that’s above-average in terms of protection; for easier trails, you can get away with less.
Excellent foot protection thanks to generous rubber rands, a burly toe cap, solid heel protection, a durable leather upper, and a rock plate or TPU insert.
Average foot protection. Great for easy trails but not our top choice for difficult terrain.
Sub-par foot protection. Not recommended for most hiking trails.
Our sustainability rating for hiking shoes considers ten distinct criteria. At the product level, we’re looking for recycled or Bluesign-approved materials, responsible leather (if applicable), and PFAS/PFC-free waterproof membranes and durable water-repellent finishes (if applicable). On the brand level, our criteria include whether the company has a dedicated resale or recycling program, uses recycled or reduced packaging, monitors greenhouse gas emissions, and publishes an annual impact report. Hiking shoes with a high sustainability rating meet several of these criteria, while those with a lower sustainability rating may meet none or just a few. We also consider the degree to which our criteria are met; for example, 10% recycled materials is not the same as 100% recycled materials. Note that not every sustainability effort by a brand or product aligns neatly with our categories. In these circumstances, we may adjust a rating based on these factors. You can find details on these factors in the sustainability drop-down under each product above.
These shoes are among the most sustainable on the market and earn our Better Trail Certified distinction. They often meet most of our sustainability criteria for this category.
These shoes are a good, middle-of-the-pack option for sustainability. They often meet about half or more of our criteria for this category.
These shoes are the least sustainable and have significant room for improvement. They usually only meet about a quarter or less of our criteria.
Anatomy of a Hiking Shoe
Leather is renowned for its durability, making it an ideal choice for hiking shoes. We’ve had some hikers—namely, the La Sportiva TX4 Evo—that hold up so well that they need a resole before the upper shows any signs of breaking down. Leather conforms to the foot over time, resulting in a comfortable, glove-like fit. It’s also highly water resistant and can be decently waterproof when treated with a leather wax or spray. There are many types of leather, but we often see split-grain (thinner but less durable than full-grain) and Nubuck (supple, with a suede-like finish) used most frequently in hiking shoes.
The downside of leather is that it’s generally heavier than synthetic uppers, takes time to break in (you’re more likely to suffer a blister in a leather shoe than a synthetic one), and isn’t particularly breathable. As a result, leather hiking shoes are an excellent choice for those seeking long-lasting and protective footwear, or hikers who venture out in cool temperatures. However, they’re not our first pick for warm conditions or those who prize quick movement and agility.
Hiking shoes with synthetic uppers are ideal for hiking in hot weather or for those seeking a lightweight, nimble design. Most synthetic materials aren’t as durable or protective as leather, although modern-day offerings that weave in Kevlar (as seen on the NNormal Tomir 02’s Matryx upper) and Cordura come pretty close. Synthetic materials are also known for their breathability and low weight, and they generally wick rather than absorb moisture (as leather is prone to do). Synthetic hiking shoes are our top recommendation for the fast-and-light crowd and those looking for a modern, lightweight trail solution.
When purchasing hiking shoes, you have the choice between waterproof and non-waterproof designs. Everyone wants dry feet, but waterproof footwear doesn’t breathe well and can easily grow swampy and clammy. Waterproof low-top shoes are particularly prone to water seepage at the ankle—and once water is inside a waterproof shoe, it has no way to drain. Finally, waterproof shoes are generally $10 to $30 more than non-waterproof designs and might tack on a few extra ounces.
Regardless of whether a shoe has a leather or synthetic upper, waterproofing is achieved through a waterproof-breathable membrane that lines the inside of the upper material. Gore-Tex is the biggest name in waterproofing and offers the most reliable protection, but in-house efforts like Keen.Dry and Oboz’s B-Dry work in all but the most sustained moisture. Regular maintenance is required to keep your waterproof shoe performing well, including cleaning (dirt and grime can clog the pores of a waterproof membrane) and application of products like Nikwax’s Fabric & Leather Proof Spray.
One of the primary downsides of a hiking shoe, compared to a hiking boot, is its vulnerability to collecting debris due to the low collar. Depending on where you’re hiking, this could be sand, scree, cactus needles, burrs and seeds, snow, or just plain ol’ dirt. Gaiters are great for keeping your shoes debris-free, and we especially like streamlined offerings like Dirty Girl Gaiters and Altra’s Trail Gaiters. These gaiters pair with any shoe on this list, although they work especially well with those with gaiter attachment points, such as the Altra Lone Peak 9 and Saucony Peregrine 15.
If you want an even sleeker solution, look for a hiking shoe with a sock-like upper, which forms a seal around your foot to keep out debris. These include models like the La Sportiva Prodigio Hike GTX, La Sportiva Levante, and Arc’teryx Vertex Alpine.
Getting a good lock with your shoes’ laces is essential, as a loose shoe can move around and cause rubbing, especially at the heel. Most of the shoes on our list above use a standard lacing system that requires you to tie a knot, whereas Salomon’s models (like the X Ultra 5 GTX) utilize their one-pull Quicklace. We love the ease and security of the Quicklace system, but wouldn’t go so far as to base a purchasing decision on it. Regarding laces, we certainly favor flat over rounded designs, as the latter are prone to coming undone, even when double-knotted.
The midsole is situated directly on top of the outsole and is primarily responsible for the shoe’s cushioning, stability, and underfoot protection. Here, we see materials like lightweight EVA foam, stiff polyurethane foam, and even rock plates. The material greatly impacts the feel of the midsole, ranging from plush and bouncy trail running shoes like the Hoka Speedgoat, to stiff, boot-like shoes like the Keen Targhee IV. The former offers great comfort for easy trail miles but will feel squirrely on off-camber terrain, while the latter is stable, protective, and durable. We recommend shoes with flexible midsoles and plush cushioning for well-established trails and experienced hikers who like to move quickly and nimbly. On the other hand, shoes with stiffer midsoles are a great pairing for rocky and rooty trails and hikers who value security and support over agility and weight savings.
The outsole of a hiking shoe is the part that makes contact with the ground as you hike. Most outsoles are made of 100% rubber, designed to provide a confidence-inspiring hold on a variety of terrain, including dirt, rock, and snow. Several factors determine how well an outsole performs, including the type of rubber and the pattern and depth of the lugs.
Outsole rubber ranges from sticky and soft (climbing shoes feature the stickiest rubber blends) to durable and firm. Most hiking shoes lean toward the more durable side of this spectrum, which is sufficient for dirt trails with the odd root or rock. On the other hand, approach shoes and some hiking shoes, as well as trail runners (especially those from La Sportiva and NNormal), strike a balance between durability and traction on rock—these are excellent choices for routes that travel above treeline. Some rubber compounds are specifically designed to provide grip on slippery terrain, such as ice, wet leaves, and snow. In general, you can expect names like Vibram and Continental to deliver confidence-inspiring traction on challenging terrain, while in-house efforts like Oboz’s Granite Peak or Keen’s Keen.Rugged get the job done on trails but aren’t well-suited for cross-country routes.
Additionally, the tread pattern and lug depth of an outsole significantly impact traction. Sharp and long lugs generally offer excellent hold on soft terrain like wet leaves, mud, and snow, while rounded and shallow lugs are well-suited for rock (La Sportiva’s TX4 Evo and Bushido III are great examples of the latter). To offer more versatility, most hiking shoes feature both styles of lugs: It’s common to see sharper lugs on the heel (great for braking on the downhill) and smooth patches of rubber at the toe, known as the “climbing zone.”
Most hiking shoes feature one or a number of components that help to boost support and structure around the foot. Under the foot are plates or shanks: These lie in between the midsole and outsole and are generally made with nylon or a flexible plastic known as thermoplastic polyurethane. Both shanks and plates help with torsional rigidity and side-to-side stability (while keeping the forefoot flexible for an easy stride); plates in particular help to protect your feet from sharp objects on the ground. On the outside of the shoe, manufacturers boost rigidity with components like a frame above the midsole and a rigid heel counter. The external frame increases the shoe’s lateral stability, overall structure, and protection, while the heel counter minimzes the movement of the foot and provides rigidity for heel strikes.
The weight of a hiking shoe impacts your comfort and speed on the trail. In fact, according to a 1984 study by the U.S. Army Research Institute, one pound on your feet is worth five pounds on your back. For this reason, we’re big fans of lightweight hiking shoes, which generally weigh under 1.5 pounds per pair. For example, the La Sportiva Bushido III weighs 1 pound 5 ounces for the pair, while the trail-running-specific Hoka Speedgoat 7 is just 1 pound 3.4 ounces.
However, lightweight hiking shoes have their fair share of tradeoffs. They’re typically less stable, supportive, protective, and durable. These are acceptable compromises if you stick to smooth, hard-packed trails (like the Pacific Crest Trail, for example) and prioritize quick movement. Experienced hikers may opt for lightweight hiking shoes when venturing into more demanding terrain. However, you’ll want a heavier design if you prefer your hiking shoe to offer a solid platform for your feet and keep you well isolated from the elements.
How Should I Size My Hiking Shoes?
Most hikers will want to size their hiking shoes similarly to how they size the rest of their shoes—you want a good lock at the ankle (so that your heel isn’t rubbing with each step) and a small amount of room in front of your toes. If you’re taking on big days and foot swelling is an issue—or if you like to wear thick socks (which we don’t recommend for summer hiking)—consider sizing up a half-size. We’ve found that hiking shoes made by European brands (including La Sportiva, Salomon, and Salomon-owned Arc’teryx) can run narrow, although there are some exceptions to this rule, which we call out in the product descriptions above. Furthermore, some hiking shoes are available in wide versions.
Your Questions Answered
We have many opinions on waterproof hiking shoes. We generally recommend them for the cool-weather conditions found in spring or fall, when wet feet could pose safety concerns. They protect against small puddles, shallow river crossings, consolidated snow crossings, wet branches, and even light rain. We’ve been grateful for our waterproof hiking shoes on many occasions.
However, more often than not, we opt for non-waterproof footwear. Most of us prefer to hike in the summertime, when wet feet might be more of a relief than a concern (we call it radiant cooling). Moreover, non-waterproof footwear is inherently more breathable than waterproof footwear, which keeps your feet cool and dry in warm conditions. And if you’re encountering deep water or snow that risks entering your shoe at the collar, you don’t want to be wearing a waterproof hiking shoe—once moisture is inside, it has no way of escaping. For trekking on snow in particular (something we tend to do a lot of in the Pacific Northwest), we’re big fans of a non-waterproof hiking shoe-waterproof sock combo. Rocky Brand's Gore-Tex sock has been our long-time favorite, but is now difficult to find in stock; Montbell makes a similar pair in their Gore-Tex All Round High Socks.
This comes down to a matter of personal preference.
We love looking around at what other hikers are wearing on the trail. Often, we’ll see sandals, trail runners, hiking shoes, hiking boots, mountaineering boots—even bare feet—all on the same trail. As an extreme example, one of our co-founders traversed the entirety of the North Cascades wearing trail running shoes, while others would only do so in a pair of full-shank mountaineering boots. In most instances, what you wear on your feet is truly up to you.
But there are some general rules that will help guide your choice of footwear. When deciding what’s best for you, ask yourself the following questions:
How fast do I intend to move? Do I want to log 20 miles per day, or am I content to cover less ground? Those with loftier mileage goals will benefit from a lightweight trail runner.
How much protection do I want? Will a stubbed toe throw me for a loop, and do I really want to feel every rock and root beneath my feet? Your feet will be much more isolated from the elements in a hiking shoe.
How heavy will my pack be? Even the most skilled hikers won’t want to carry a 50-pound backpacking pack with trail running shoes, as you’ll want a solid underfoot platform (read: not plush cushioning) to handle the extra weight.
What sort of terrain will I be covering? On off-camber terrain, you’ll benefit from a stable hiking shoe. On smooth, established trails, a trail running shoe is the most comfortable choice.
How long do I want my shoes to last? This is a big one. Most trail running shoes will wear down after 300 to 400 miles, while burlier hiking shoes might still be going at mile 1,000.
Finally, we’ll note that the distinction between trail runners and hiking shoes is not black and white. Take the Topo Athletic Traverse: trail runner or hiking shoe? It’s got the cushion and low weight of a trail runner, but the full rubber outsole and stability of a hiking shoe. Not only that, but it’ll last you 650 miles. These hybrids are incredibly versatile and among our top shoe recommendations.
Compared to other categories of outdoor gear, the price range of hiking shoes is relatively tight. At the low end of the spectrum, the Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 and a host of trail running shoes (like the Brooks Cascadia 19 and Altra Lone Peak 9) come in around $140 to $150, while the On Cloudhorizon Waterproof is the most expensive shoe in this gear guide at $200. $50 matters of course, but unlike ski jackets, where the price range between budget and high-end can be a factor of four, we tend to think you should focus on the attributes and fit of the various shoes as your deciding factors. A great pair of hiking footwear that suits your needs and keeps you comfortable on the trail has significant value—in some cases, they may last 500 miles or more.
Weight is a primary consideration for many hikers these days, especially those reading this article instead of our take on the best hiking boots. The answer is a little complicated because this gear guide includes a handful of trail runners that are commonly used for hiking, including the Hoka Speedgoat 7 (1 lb. 3.4 oz.) and La Sportiva Prodigio Max (1 lb. 4.8 oz.). Coming in at just over one pound per pair is impressive, but it’s worth noting that we rate the Speedgoat and Bushido relatively low in areas like support and stability, protection, and durability. The feathery feel of these shoes makes them excellent for moving quickly and nimbly, but their low weight certainly comes with tradeoffs.
In the category of hiking shoes, the good news is that you still have plenty of options well below a pound and a half. The Topo Athletic Traverse is the lightest hiking shoe, weighing 1 pound 5.2 ounces per pair, followed by the Altra Lone Peak 9 and NNormal Tomir 02, both of which weigh around 1 pound 6 ounces. These shoes are noticeably more capable than a lightweight trail runner, featuring elements such as rock plates, more durable uppers, and full-rubber outsoles. Unless you’re headed into off-trail terrain or need a really beefy hiking shoe to help stabilize a heavy load, we think a lightweight hiking shoe is the way to go.
Hiking footwear isn’t quite at the forefront of sustainability in the same way as apparel, but brands are making strides, and there are solid options. Our sustainability team conducted a comprehensive analysis of the hiking shoe category, identifying ten key criteria at both the product and brand levels. The Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX led the pack, featuring highlights such as recycled materials, responsibly sourced leather, and a PFAS-free membrane and DWR. Every product featured on Better Trail gets a complete sustainability analysis (for a breakdown of the Anacapa, see our Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX Sustainability Report), and you can prioritize sustainability in your research by selecting in the sort-by drop-down above the product picks.
Hiking Shoes vs. Hiking Boots
Similar to deciding between a trail runner and a hiking shoe, the hiking boot versus shoe decision comes down to personal preference. Most of the Better Trail staff hike exclusively in hiking shoes and only step up to a boot for mountaineering objectives that include steep snow or crampon use. On the other hand, we know folks who won’t carry an overnight load without hiking boots on their feet. They are used to their footwear offering above-the-ankle protection, and anything less would feel unsupportive and vulnerable. If this describes you, we've put together a similar article on the best hiking boots.
So, we encourage you to go with what feels good. However, if you’ve never tried a hiking shoe, we think it’s worth a shot. Unless you have particularly weak ankles, a hiking shoe will be more comfortable, especially for most hikers who stick to established trails. And while you’re at it, consider taking some weight out of your backpack, too. We’re convinced that the lighter you are, the more enjoyable a time you’ll have on the trail.
hit the trail
Learn More About Hiking Gear
Gear Guide
Best Hiking Boots of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Hiking Pants of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Hiking Daypacks of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Trekking Poles of 2026
Product Ranking
The Most Sustainable Hiking Shoes
Gear Guide
Best Down Jackets of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Rain Jackets of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Fleece Jackets of 2026
curated for you