Updated:
Jan 19, 2025The Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX ($180) features the brand’s signature cushy midsole alongside a tough leather upper and stable platform. While its wide base and heel extension may take some getting used to, the Anacapa is a fantastic shoe for hikers and lightweight backpackers who prioritize comfort, weight, grip, and a stable ride.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 8.8 oz.
Waterproof
Yes (non-WP available)
Upper
Leather/synthetic
Outsole
Vibram Megagrip
Pros
Cons
Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Hiking Shoes.
This category is where the Hoka Anacapa 2 Low shines. It’s generously padded throughout, featuring a thick foam midsole that provides excellent cushioning and helps prevent foot fatigue. I found that the soft, tall heel tab makes the shoe easy to slip on and wear over long days, and the fit of the upper helps avoid any hot spots or blisters.
The Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX features a sole with a rocker at the toe and heel, and notably, a midsole that extends about an inch back from your heel, reducing the impact of hard heel strikes. While the heel design may feel clunky and bulky for hikers with large feet like mine, it does add cushioning and comfort, particularly on downhill sections. Despite the thick midsole, the shoe remained flexible enough for me to run comfortably in it—I felt that the Anacapa was light, pliant, yet stable, blending the benefits of both a trail running shoe and a hiking shoe.
Despite its generous cushioning, the Anacapa provides moderate support and stability. With its broad platform and low footbed, it effectively keeps my foot secure and helps prevent ankle rolls (somewhat surprising given the shoe doesn’t feature a shank or any additional reinforcements). The EVA midsole (made with 30% recycled sugarcane) provides stability and helps keep the shoe lightweight. However, while the Anacapa’s wide last and extended heel enhance stability, the design can be a hindrance in more technical terrain as it reduces mobility and ground feel.
With its medium level of stiffness and slightly larger surface area, the Anacapa is more dependable for backpacking compared to my Hoka Challenger trail running shoes. On the other hand, the Anacapa won’t support a heavy pack as effectively as a truly rigid hiking shoe such as the Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2. Although the Anacapa is supportive and stable enough for a multiday trip, I personally prefer a mid- or high-top boot if I’m backpacking with a pack over 40 pounds across rugged terrain. Therefore, for more demanding trips, I’d recommend the Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX, which offers similar comfort and performance but with more ankle support and protection.
The Anacapa provides a reliable grip on both muddy trails and rocky slabs. Its Vibram Megagrip outsole has medium firmness and is slightly bendable, with 5-millimeter multidirectional lugs that are deep enough to bite into dirt in mud but spacious enough to avoid caking. Larger lugs at the heel help with braking on the downhill.
The outsole features a patch of blown rubber—super-soft material commonly found in road running shoes—in the middle of the tread (right under the middle of the foot); while this section breaks down faster than the rest of the Vibram tread, it doesn’t impact grip at all. Overall, the Anacapa offers a large surface area for gripping the ground, but the bulkiness of the midsole/outsole design can feel awkward and may affect your confidence in your footing.
This shoe has held up well through bushwhacking and other trail adventures. The Anacapa’s mesh fabric and Nubuck leather are strategically placed along the sides and heel to endure wear and tear, and I haven’t noticed signs of deterioration. The outsoles did become scuffed a fair amount on my off-trail excursions, but this is to be expected—I consider worn-looking shoes to be a badge of honor after time spent in the wild. The Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX is impressively durable for a lightweight trail shoe, and I trust it will stay with me for many seasons of hiking.
With solid toe protection and ample cushioning, the Anacapa keeps your feet well-protected on the trail. The rubber covering most of the forefoot helps prevent pain when you stub your toes, while the thick midsole isolates your feet from sharp rocks and roots. Due to the shoe’s width, I found myself tripping and banging my toes a bit more frequently than normal, but the rubber bumpers and underfoot cushioning absorbed the impact. (While I’d prefer a bit more rubber protection on the sides, this would likely reduce breathability.) The Nubuck leather on the upper is effective at preventing anything from poking through when bushwhacking through aggressive terrain.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
PFAS-Free DWR
Durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses a PFAS-free DWR, while a red X means the DWR contains PFAS.
PFAS-Free Waterproof Membrane
The membranes used in waterproof products such as rain jackets, ski jackets, and shoes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are valued for their resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product’s waterproof membrane is PFAS-free, while a red X means it contains PFAS.
Responsible Leather
Responsible leather is typically sourced from suppliers certified by the Leather Working Group (LWG), a third-party nonprofit that evaluates tanneries on factors such as water and energy use, chemical and waste management, emissions, traceability, and worker safety, and assigns ratings ranging from Bronze to Gold. A green check mark indicates a product uses responsibly sourced leather, a yellow check mark indicates the brand sources responsible leather for the majority of its products but does not specify it at the product level, and a red X indicates the product does not use responsibly sourced leather.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
Listed at 1 pound 8.8 ounces for a women’s size 7, the Anacapa is an average weight for a modern (read: trail-running-shoe-inspired) low-top hiking shoe. It’s lighter than the Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2 Low GTX (1 lb. 11.7 oz.), which has extra-thick cushioning and a stiffer build, as well as the Hoka Kaha 2 Low GTX (1 lb. 11.6 oz.), which is stiffer and more durable due to a full Nubuck upper. On the other hand, there are lighter alternatives, such as Hoka’s Speedgoat 6 GTX (1 lb. 2 oz.), which features softer cushioning but less support and durability. The heavier options will be more robust—suitable choices for hikers who need a shoe that will survive being put through the wringer on a technical trail while supporting a fully loaded, multi-day pack. Lighter options are ideal for individuals who prioritize fast hiking and running.
Waterproof Liner
I was pleasantly surprised by how waterproof the Anacapa was, especially considering the mesh-and-leather upper felt so light and thin. The shoe features a Gore-Tex Invisible Fit lining that is impressively waterproof, but lighter and more breathable than traditional Gore-Tex. I fully submerged my foot and found that my socks and feet stayed dry and clean as long as I didn't step in water that was deeper than the height of my shoe. Despite the waterproofing, the fabric remains breathable and comfortable on dry, warm hikes. I wore the Anacapa on several outings in Washington’s Snoqualmie Pass area, in hot, dry conditions, and my feet stayed cool and remained dry. The Anacapa is far more versatile than my less breathable Altra Olympus 6 Hike Low GTX, which has thicker fabric.
Lacing System
If there was anything that frustrated me about the Anacapa, it was the shoe’s round laces, which come untied easily. I found myself constantly retightening them throughout the day—in my experience, flat laces lock in place much better than round ones. Otherwise, the eyelets on the Anacapa are reinforced with metal, giving me confidence that they will last through a lot of use.
Typically I fall between a women’s size 10 and 11, and I prefer a size 10.5 when available. Fortunately, the Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX comes in a 10.5, which fits my feet just right length-wise. The toe box is of average width, and while I usually prefer more space for my wide feet, I never felt constricted. The midfoot and heel held my foot in as well (though not as snugly as mid-height boots). I often have a tough time finding shoes that fit my wide feet (which also have bunions and flat arches), and sometimes even opt for men’s hiking shoes due to their wider fit and larger sizes. However, the Anacapa remained comfortable even when my feet swelled after long days on the trail.
Adidas Terrex Free Hiker GTX 2.0 Low ($180): Stiffer and Sturdier
Although it has the appearance of a trail running shoe, the Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2.0 Low Gore-Tex is noticeably stiffer and more stable than the Anacapa. Its full Continental rubber outsole offers superior grip and protection, too. This sturdier build translates to a heavier shoe—the Free Hiker is 1 pound 15 ounces—although the Free Hiker’s nimble, rockered design still moves quickly down the trail. At the same price point ($180), the choice will come down to whether you want the Anacapa’s plush cushioning for easy to moderate trails or the Free Hiker’s better stability, agility, and grip in rocky terrain. For more, read our review of the Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2.0 Low.
On Cloudhorizon Waterproof ($200): Lighter and Softer
The On Cloudhorizon Waterproof is also a max-cushion hiking shoe. For around the same weight as the Anacapa (1 lb. 9.2 oz.), it features a thick midsole that’s softer and more flexible, a mesh upper with a waterproof membrane, and a mostly rubber outsole (with a channel of exposed foam down the middle for weight savings). Given its plush cushioning, the Cloudhorizon is not as stable as the Anacapa, and its proprietary materials fall short of the Anacapa’s Gore-Tex membrane and grippy Vibram Megagrip outsole. However, its sneaker-like fit is a bit more approachable than the Anacapa’s large base and extended heel, as long as you stick to easy trails. For more, see our review of the On Cloudhorizon Waterproof.
The Anacapa offers the plush cushion of a running shoe, alongside the stability, protection, and durability of a hiking shoe. It's a great option for hikers who regularly experience foot fatigue or log high-mileage days. However, the wide platform lacks precision on technical terrain and the large sections of exposed foam can break down over time.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Don’t be fooled by the modern aesthetic: The Free Hiker 2 is a highly supportive, grippy hiking shoe that can deftly tackle technical, off-camber terrain. But you don’t get extra padding or cushion, and the heavy, stiff build won’t appeal to everyone.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
The Cloudhorizon is a plush and comfortable hiking shoe characterized by an airy CloudTec midsole. However, the soft cushioning detracts from stability, the midsole holes collect debris, and the thin outsole isn’t very durable. We only recommend the Cloudhorizon for easy frontcountry trails.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
The Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX is a well-executed hike-ification of their popular trail running line. Its generous cushioning is supremely comfortable—no surprise there—while its outsole and midsole provide reliable grip and stability. However, the wide platform may take some getting used to, and we don’t recommend it for scrambling or especially rugged terrain, where precise footing is essential. That said, if you’re an on-trail hiker and backpacker who prioritizes high levels of cushioning in your shoe, you’ll probably find the Anacapa’s blend of comfort, protection, and durability worth the somewhat steep price of $180.
it's trail o'clock
Gear Guide
Best Hiking Boots of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Pants of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Daypacks of 2026Gear Guide
Best Trekking Poles of 2026Gear Guide
Best Synthetic Insulated Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Rain Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Fleece Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Down Jackets of 2026curated for you