The Merrell Moab 3 Waterproof ($160) is a classic for good reason. It’s exceptionally comfortable right out of the box, built to last with durable materials, and offers excellent support and protection for everything from casual day hikes to multi-day backpacking trips. True, it feels clunky and heavy compared to more modern, trail runner-inspired options, and fast-moving hikers will likely find it slow. But for comfort-focused hikers and backpackers who prioritize durability and reliability over speed, the Moab 3 more than lives up to its well-earned reputation.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 5.2 oz.
Waterproof
Yes (non-WP available)
Upper
Leather
Outsole
Vibram TC5
Pros
Cons
Merrell Moab 3 Waterproof
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Hiking Shoes.
I’ll admit it: I was skeptical of the Merrell Moab 3 from a distance. The design always looked bulky and outdated compared to more modern hiking shoes. But after lacing them up for the first time, I immediately understood their enduring popularity. Right out of the box, the Moab 3 feels broken-in, with soft, supple materials, plush cushioning around the collar and tongue, and just enough flexibility in the forefoot to move easily on the trail. The fit is equally foot-friendly, offering a roomy toe box, decent arch support, and a secure, locked-in heel (more on fit below).
Underfoot, the Merrell Moab 3 offers relatively firm but substantial cushioning. It’s not squishy in the way a Hoka shoe is, but it avoids feeling harsh or board-like. Instead, the ride is supportive and stable, helping stave off foot fatigue even after 10+ miles or under a 25- to 30-pound overnight pack. This balance of comfort and support makes the Moab a standout choice for long days on the trail, especially for hikers carrying heavier loads.
Where the Moab 3 falls a little short is in agility. The shoe’s heft and relatively stiff construction make it less appealing for fast-moving day hikes, scrambling, or fastpacking. It’s not the kind of shoe you’ll want to break into a jog with, and at the end of a long day, you'll likely be eager to swap it for lighter and softer camp shoes. Still, for traditional hiking and backpacking where comfort, support, and durability matter most, the Moab 3 earns its reputation as one of the best.
Among low-top hiking shoes, the Merrell Moab 3 stands out as one of the most supportive options available. Thanks to its relatively wide base, a nylon shank, and a stiffened heel, the shoe offers a boot-like sense of stability—without the added weight and coverage of a full boot. The lacing system is equally impressive, providing a comfortable, locked-in fit that boosts confidence over uneven terrain. On the trail, the Moab 3 feels highly resistant to twisting or rolling, providing a planted and secure ride even with a loaded pack.
While it doesn’t reach the rigidity of an approach shoe, the Moab strikes a great balance between trail feel and protection. It's a reliable pairing for both established trails and light off-trail adventuring, and it handles multi-day backpacking loads without issue. Personally, I tend to prefer more flexible footwear for fast-paced mountain days. However, for hikers who prioritize a stable and supportive feel—especially when carrying a heavy backpack—the Moab 3 delivers in spades.
The Merrell Moab 3’s traction strikes a solid middle ground, making it a reliable choice for most on-trail uses. The Vibram TC5+ outsole isn’t particularly tacky and doesn’t grip rock as confidently as Vibram’s premium Megagrip compound, but it’s a trustworthy all-rounder that holds its own on everything from light mud and slick rock to dry, dusty dirt. The lugs are substantial and well-spaced, offering good bite on steep climbs and descents without feeling overly aggressive.
One of the Moab’s biggest strengths is the durability of its tread. The rubber is relatively firm, and the tight spacing between the lugs helps extend the life of the sole over rocky, rough terrain. However, the tradeoff is that the outsole can cake up in heavy mud and doesn’t shed debris as easily as more open, studded designs. And while it’s perfectly fine for general hiking, the Moab’s grip falls a little short for scrambling or technical rock, where a stickier rubber would inspire more confidence. Still, for the vast majority of hikers and trails, the Moab 3’s outsole is versatile and dependable.
The Moab 3 scores highly in durability, thanks to an upper dominated by leather, quality materials, and a hardwearing outsole. While the shoe does feature sections of open-weave mesh for breathability, the extensive use of pig suede leather makes it highly resistant to abrasion, even after repeated encounters with rough rock and trail debris. Compared with the thin, lightweight uppers common on modern hiking footwear—including Merrell’s own Moab Speed 2—the old-school construction of the Moab 3 is a refreshing and confidence-inspiring alternative.
Additional overlays along the toe cap and heel bolster provide both protection and long-term durability. Even smaller components, such as the tongue and laces, are clearly built with longevity in mind, leaning heavier and sturdier rather than prioritizing weight savings. As highlighted in the “Traction” section above, the firm outsole rubber and tight lug pattern also help maximize lifespan. Altogether, the Moab 3 is a standout for hikers who value tough, dependable gear that’s built to last.
The Merrell Moab 3 feels almost tank-like in its construction, offering impressive all-around foot protection. At the front, a substantial rubber toe cap shields against direct impacts with rocks and roots, while a reinforced and thickened heel counter provides added stability and protection at the rear. Additionally, the shoe’s substantial cushioning around the collar and tongue, combined with the burly leather upper, effectively guards against side hits from trail debris and brush.
While some models like the Keen Targhee IV offer even greater protection with a full wraparound rubber toe cap, we’ve taken some solid hits in the Moab 3 without issue. Underfoot, the moderately thick and firm cushioning does a great job of isolating your feet from sharp rocks and uneven ground. Altogether, it’s one of the most confidence-inspiring low-top hiking shoes when it comes to rugged trail protection.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
PFAS-Free DWR
Durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses a PFAS-free DWR, while a red X means the DWR contains PFAS.
PFAS-Free Waterproof Membrane
The membranes used in waterproof products such as rain jackets, ski jackets, and shoes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are valued for their resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product’s waterproof membrane is PFAS-free, while a red X means it contains PFAS.
Responsible Leather
Responsible leather is typically sourced from suppliers certified by the Leather Working Group (LWG), a third-party nonprofit that evaluates tanneries on factors such as water and energy use, chemical and waste management, emissions, traceability, and worker safety, and assigns ratings ranging from Bronze to Gold. A green check mark indicates a product uses responsibly sourced leather, a yellow check mark indicates the brand sources responsible leather for the majority of its products but does not specify it at the product level, and a red X indicates the product does not use responsibly sourced leather.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
I tested the waterproof version of the women’s Moab 3, which has a listed weight of 1 pound 10.1 ounces (the men’s low-top waterproof version weighs 2 pounds 2 ounces). This puts the Moab 3 firmly among the heavier options in the hiking shoe category—and it definitely feels that way underfoot. You can save a notable 5+ ounces by opting for Merrell’s more agile Moab Speed 2, while Hoka’s popular Anacapa 2 Low trims a few ounces and feels even nimbler thanks to its bouncier midsole.
Weight is arguably the Moab 3’s biggest downside and a real consideration if you plan to cover serious mileage or want the ability to break into a run on the trail. Beyond just the numbers, the shoe’s wide platform and relatively stiff construction make it less intuitive for activities like rock hopping or scrambling. It’s simply more shoe than some fast-moving hikers will want. That said, it’s not as heavy as a full-on leather hiking boot, and there are even burlier low-top alternatives like Keen’s leather Targhee IV Waterproof (1 lb. 15.5 oz. for the women’s; 2 lb. 6.4 oz. for the men’s).
I generally wear a size 8.5, but sometimes size up to a women’s 9 in running shoes. I opted for a women’s 9 in the Merrell Moab 3, and the fit was spot-on. The shoe was an excellent match for my slightly wide foot, offering a locked-in and secure feel despite the shoe’s somewhat bulky appearance. We’ve also tested the men’s version of the Moab 3 and came away with a similar impression: The length runs true to size, the moderately roomy toe box provides plenty of space for natural toe splay, and the average-volume midfoot combined with a secure heel makes it easy to dial in a trustworthy fit. Even on tricky, uneven terrain, the Moab’s fit inspires confidence without feeling sloppy or unstable.
Merrell Moab Speed 2 GTX ($170): Welcome to the Future
Merrell’s Moab Speed 2 takes the highlights of the original Moab—comfort, stability, and quality craftsmanship—and brings the design up to speed (no pun intended) for modern hikers. The Speed 2 is about 5 ounces lighter for the pair (9 ounces in the men’s version) and has a more cushioned and bouncy underfoot feel. If you don’t mind the slight drop in durability and protection, the Speed offers an excellent balance between a traditional hiking shoe and a full-on trail runner. Added up, it's an excellent choice for everyone from casual hikers to those who log 20-plus miles a day. For a deeper dive, see our Moab Speed 2 review.
Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX ($170): Nimble and Technical
For a more technical and performance-driven alternative to the Moab 3, check out the Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX. The Salomon is lighter, nimbler, and offers a closer-to-the-trail feel, making it the better pick for fast-paced day hikes or rougher terrain. It’s also more supportive, with a glove-like fit, although the narrower toe box may not work for everyone. The Moab, by contrast, excels in plush comfort, an out-of-the-box fit, and overall durability, making it better suited for casual trails and long, steady miles. For more, read our review of the Salomon X Ultra 5.
Oboz Sawtooth X Low WP ($165): A Similar Shoe From Oboz
It’s nice to have options, especially when it comes to finding the right fit. The Oboz Sawtooth X features a design similar to the Moab 3, including a durable leather upper with mesh cutouts, a stiff midsole, and a burly rubber outsole. Both shoes weigh about the same as well. The Sawtooth looks more like a monster truck with Oboz’s stereotypical sidewall lugs—a love-it-or-hate-it feature—and is $25 more. Where the Moab pulls ahead is comfort: Its sculpted shape and softer feel underfoot (relatively speaking) make it easier for piling on miles.
Merrell’s traditional hiking shoe features plush padding for comfort, a durable and protective leather upper, and a stiff build that can easily forge its way through most terrain. It’ll last significantly longer than most lightweight synthetic hiking shoes. However, it’s too heavy and clunky for many modern hikers.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
An approachable design, the Moab Speed 2 combines hiking-shoe-like stability and support with the low weight and rockered style of a trail running shoe. It's comfortable out of the box and adept both on and off-trail. However, it lacks the performance fit and agility you’d get with a trail runner.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Salomon’s popular lightweight hiker offers a nice balance of agility, protection, and durability for everything from easy trails to cross-country travel. It’s not as soft and cushioned as a trail runner, and the fit runs narrow, but it’s otherwise a top all-around performer.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
If comfort, durability, and value are your priorities, the Merrell Moab 3 Waterproof is hard to beat. It fits and feels great right out of the box, is built to last, and is supportive enough for everything from casual day hikes to hauling overnight loads. You do pay a penalty in weight and agility—this isn’t the hiking shoe for fast-moving hikers or those tackling technical terrain at speed—but for a wide range of folks, from beginners to seasoned backpackers looking for a reliable low-top, the Moab 3 continues to be a proven and popular choice.
it's trail o'clock
Gear Guide
Best Hiking Boots of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Pants of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Daypacks of 2026Gear Guide
Best Trekking Poles of 2026Gear Guide
Best Synthetic Insulated Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Rain Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Fleece Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Down Jackets of 2026curated for you