Warmth
Comfort & Mobility
Breathability
Weight & Packability
Weather Resistance
Sustainability
Insulation
3.5 oz/sqyd ThermoBall
Fabric
20D
Packable
Yes (pocket)
Pros
Cons
The North Face ThermoBall Hoodie 2.0
The North Face ThermoBall was updated for fall 2025 with a new baffle pattern to reduce cold spots and 100% recycled fabrics and insulation. The latest version—now named The North Face ThermoBall Hooded—is priced the same at $250. You can read our review of the updated Thermoball Hooded here.
The North Face ThermoBall Hoodie 2.0 delivers moderate warmth for a synthetic jacket, making it a solid option for casual three-season use. I wore it on and off throughout a season of hiking and town life in El Chaltén, Patagonia, rotating it with jackets like the Patagonia Micro Puff and The North Face Casaval Hybrid Hoody. It lacked the performance bent of the ultralight Micro Puff and breathable Casaval, but it was the jacket I reached for when the temperatures were about 50 degrees Fahrenheit and I wanted a light insulator to cut the chill.
The North Face doesn’t use a standard insulation spec here, listing ThermoBall fill as 11 grams per square foot (rather than grams per square meter, which most brands use). That roughly converts to 118g/m²—a surprisingly high figure that suggests winter-weight insulation. In practice, however, the warmth doesn’t match the math. The North Face ThermoBall Hoodie 2.0 is roughly on par with the warmth of a synthetic insulated jacket like Patagonia’s Nano Puff (which uses 60g PrimaLoft). ThermoBall insulation isn’t as thermally efficient as other down-mimicking fills like Patagonia’s PlumaFill, and the real-world warmth reflects that.
The North Face ThermoBall Hoodie 2.0 is reasonably comfortable for a traditional synthetic insulated jacket, but it’s far from a standout in this category. The outer nylon shell feels soft enough (par for the course for a shiny, baffled puffy), and the low-profile insulation allows for decent freedom of movement. It’s on the trim side, but I had no trouble wearing it over a base layer or lightweight fleece on colder days.
That said, compared to modern active insulation pieces with stretchy panels and sweatshirt-like fabrics, the ThermoBall falls short. It lacks the supple feel and dynamic mobility of jackets like The North Face’s Casaval Hybrid or Patagonia’s Nano-Air series. For casual hiking, travel, or everyday wear, the ThermoBall offers serviceable comfort and a polished look—but if you’re moving hard or want something to live in all day, there are better options out there.
The ThermoBall Hoodie 2.0 isn’t built for high-output activity, and that became clear during my testing. Its tightly woven face and liner do a solid job blocking wind and light precipitation, but they also trap heat and moisture inside. While hiking in breezy conditions in Patagonia, the jacket quickly grew hot and humid inside, the smooth interior turning slick and clammy with even moderate sweat. I quickly learned to take it off while moving and throw it on during trail-side breaks—or better yet, leave it behind and bring my Casaval Hybrid Hoodie or Patagonia Nano-Air Ultralight instead.
To its credit, the ThermoBall doesn’t pretend to be a breathable, high-performance layer—it behaves more like a traditional down puffy. It’s perfectly adequate for camp duties, casual wear, and low-exertion outings, but if you’re planning to move fast in cold conditions, you’ll want something more air-permeable.
My women’s small ThermoBall weighed in at 13.1 ounces on my home scale—respectable for a synthetic jacket, but not particularly light. For comparison, the Patagonia Micro Puff Hoody weighs just 8.9 ounces, and the Mountain Hardwear Ghost Whisperer (an ultralight down jacket) comes in at 8.5 ounces. Both of those jackets are warmer and more compressible, too. The ThermoBall is a closer match to the Patagonia Nano Puff in terms of design and insulation, but even the women’s Nano Puff Hoody checks in lighter at 10.8 ounces.
That said, The North Face ThermoBall Hoodie 2.0 does pack down impressively well. It stuffs into its own pocket and compresses to just a bit longer than a 1-liter Nalgene bottle. The process isn’t the smoothest—the zipper opening is fairly small, making it a bit of a squeeze—but it gets the job done. For day hikes and casual backcountry use, the packed size and weight felt totally manageable, and it slid easily into my pack without feeling like a burden. But for thru-hikes or weight-sensitive missions, I’d reach for something with better warmth-to-weight efficiency.
The ThermoBall’s synthetic insulation is one reason you might reach for it over a down jacket. Unlike down, which loses loft (and warmth) when wet, synthetic insulation retains its structure and continues to insulate even when damp. The shell also features a PFAS-free durable water-repellent (DWR) finish that initially beads light moisture—but only up to a point. On a drizzly hike to Laguna Torre, the fabric shed mist and light sprinkles at first, but started wetting through within a few minutes, prompting me to pull out my rain jacket. I’d trust the ThermoBall in fog or light mist, but it falls short once real raindrops start falling.
Wind resistance is similarly middling. The jacket’s heavily baffled construction leaves plenty of seams for wind to sneak through. I stayed warm in gusts around 20 miles per hour, but I felt the chill once winds picked up, especially without a warm base layer or fleece underneath. For more serious weather protection, I’d reach for something like the Patagonia DAS Light or plan to pair the ThermoBall with a wind shell. Just keep in mind: the ThermoBall is bulky enough that you’ll likely need to size up your windbreaker (which generally run on the trim side) if you want it to layer cleanly overtop.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
PFAS-Free DWR
Durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses a PFAS-free DWR, while a red X means the DWR contains PFAS.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Repair Services
Repair services extend the lifespan of outdoor gear and reduce overall consumption, though programs vary widely. Some brands offer comprehensive repairs for a range of issues, while others provide limited or no repair support. A green check mark indicates a robust repair program, a yellow check mark indicates limited repair services, and a red X indicates the brand does not offer repair services.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
The North Face ThermoBall Hoodie 2.0 offers average durability for a synthetic jacket. Its 20-denier nylon shell is standard for synthetic insulated jackets, and after a full season of use, mine still looks virtually new. The zippers run smoothly, the hem cinch still functions like day one, and the overall build feels clean and consistent. With reasonable care, I expect this jacket to hold up well over the long haul.
That said, I have a hard time justifying its $250 price point. The ThermoBall feels like a budget jacket, primarily due to its boxy fit and the shell’s slightly sticky, unrefined hand feel. There’s just nothing special about it—it’s neither highly refined for everyday use nor particularly performance-oriented. In contrast, The North Face’s Casaval Hybrid Hoodie—just $10 more—delivers a significant upgrade in warmth, mobility, and comfort, with a stretchy, sweatshirt-like feel that’s far more versatile for hiking or climbing. Side by side, the ThermoBall just doesn’t compete.
The ThermoBall Hoodie 2.0 has a simple, pared-down feature set that reflects its around-town and casual trail use. It offers two zippered hand pockets, an internal chest pocket, and a hem cinch to seal out drafts. It stows into the chest pocket for easy packability. The hood is basic: It has no adjustment and isn’t helmet-compatible, which limits its utility for technical mountain use. All told, the features are functional but minimal—enough for daily wear and light backcountry use, but underwhelming for more performance-focused pursuits.
Tester size: 5’5” 135 lb.
Size tested: Women’s small
I’m generally a women’s small, and the size-small The North Face ThermoBall Hoodie 2.0 fit me true to size. The North Face lists this jacket as having a slim fit, and I’d agree—it’s more tailored than I’d typically expect a casual TNF jacket, which generally run on the boxy side. The hem does flare slightly, giving the fit a somewhat unrefined feel. I had no trouble layering a base layer or lightweight fleece underneath the ThermoBall, but anything bulkier—like a thick sweater or midweight fleece—would feel tight. The trim silhouette does make it a great choice for layering under a rain jacket or hardshell, which adds to its utility in wet or windy conditions.
Patagonia Nano Puff Hoody ($289): The Gold Standard
The Nano Puff has long been the benchmark in casual synthetic insulation. It’s lighter (10.8 oz. vs. 13.1 oz. for the ThermoBall), packs down smaller, and uses premium PrimaLoft Gold Eco insulation for a better warmth-to-weight ratio. It also sports a cleaner, more athletic fit and a higher-end feel overall. On the other hand, the ThermoBall has more casual styling and a slightly lower price. If you want the classic synthetic puffy and don’t mind the lower performance ceiling, the ThermoBall holds its own—but for more dialed design and better crossover performance, the Nano Puff is still queen. For more, read our review of the Nano Puff Hoody.
The North Face Casaval Hybrid Hoodie ($260): Step up Your Game
If the ThermoBall is your go-to for town and travel, the Casaval Hybrid is the better option for active mountain use. It’s more breathable thanks to Ventrix insulation and stretch-woven side panels, and noticeably more durable with a beefier 40-denier shell. We also think it's a heckuva lot more fun to wear, thanks to its stretchy sweatshirt-like feel. You lose some packability, but for dynamic pursuits like ski touring or winter hiking, it’s the far more capable piece. And at just $10 more than the ThermoBall, it’s a no-brainer upgrade for those who prioritize performance. For a deeper dive, read our Casaval Hybrid Hoodie review.
For the performance of a synthetic jacket with an urban-ready aesthetic, check out the ThermoBall. However, we think you can do better for the price, in or out of TNF’s lineup.
Warmth
Comfort & Mobility
Breathability
Weight & Packability
Weather Resistance
Sustainability
The much-loved Nano Puff fits the bill for both casual and light backcountry use, with clean styling, a versatile fit and feature set (great as a midlayer or standalone piece), and refined mobility. However, its warmth isn’t particularly competitive for the weight.
Warmth
Comfort & Mobility
Breathability
Weight & Packability
Weather Resistance
Sustainability
Straight out of TNF’s high-performance collection, the Casaval Hybrid Hoodie merges the comfort and breathability of a sweatshirt with the warmth of 60-gram insulation. It’s potentially too warm for all but the most cold-weather activities, but its durability, hand feel, and fit are hard to beat.
Warmth
Comfort & Mobility
Breathability
Weight & Packability
Weather Resistance
Sustainability
The North Face ThermoBall Eco 2.0 Hoodie is best suited for casual users looking for a low-maintenance, do-it-all synthetic jacket for everyday wear, travel, and light outdoor use. Perhaps you’re looking for that coveted TNF brand cachet or eyeing the Patagonia Nano Puff but hoping to save a few bucks—the ThermoBall delivers similar warmth, packs down small, and offers basic protection from wind and light moisture. That said, it’s not a high-performance piece: it lacks the breathability, refined materials, and athletic fit of more premium active insulators. But for daily wear and the occasional shoulder-season adventure, the ThermoBall Eco 2.0 is a dependable, user-friendly choice.
hit the trail
Gear Guide
Best Down Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Rain Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Daypacks of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Pants of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Shoes of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Boots of 2026Gear Guide
Best Fleece Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Trekking Poles of 2026curated for you