Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Rugged
Weight
3 lb. 8.4 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Leather
Pros
Cons
Lowa Camino Evo GTX
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Hiking Boots.
The Lowa Camino Evo GTX is built for rugged, demanding terrain, but comfort isn’t one of its strong suits—at least not right away. Straight out of the box, the Camino feels stiff and unyielding, and it demands a significant break-in period. Over time, the leather upper does begin to mold to your foot, but even after several outings, the boot remains noticeably firm and structured. During a 12-mile, 5,000-foot-gain backpacking trip near Whistler, BC, I experienced some cramping as the leather adjusted to my feet, but the fit was precise enough that I avoided more serious issues like blisters.
What the Lowa Camino GTX lacks in step-in comfort, it makes up for in protection and support. The firm midsole provides excellent shock absorption and isolates you from rocks and other trail obstacles, and the overall feel is reminiscent of a lightweight mountaineering boot. It’s not far off from something like my La Sportiva Aequilibrium—just without the step-in crampon-compatible heel and toe. The construction is undeniably overbuilt, and the boot delivers a confidence-inspiring and solid platform, especially under heavy loads.
Still, it’s hard to ignore the trade-offs. At 3 pounds 8.4 ounces and $350, the Camino is significantly heavier, stiffer, and pricier than alternatives like Lowa’s own Renegade GTX Mid (2 lb. 9.6 oz., $265), which proved far more comfortable in our testing (for more, read our Renegade GTX Mid review). For most hikers and backpackers, a lighter hiking boot will offer a much easier and more enjoyable experience on the trail. But if your priorities are durability, support, and a bombproof feel, the Camino Evo GTX may be worth the effort.
Support and stability are where the Lowa Camino Evo GTX truly shines. With an 8-inch over-the-ankle height, exceptionally stiff build, and secure locking lacing system, these boots provide a level of support that’s nearly unmatched in the hiking boot category. Whether navigating steep climbs, rocky descents, or uneven sidehills, the Camino feels planted and confidence-inspiring at every step.
As someone prone to ankle rolling, I particularly appreciated the boot’s firm structure and substantial upper, which offered excellent lateral support on technical terrain. These are the kind of boots that let you move through sketchy sections without second-guessing your footing—critical for both injury prevention and mental confidence under a heavy pack.
In testing, the Caminos were the most stable and supportive boots we’ve worn, rivaling the feel of lightweight mountaineering footwear. While other popular options like the Salomon Quest 4 GTX or Keen Targhee III offer solid support in more flexible and lighter packages, they simply don’t match the tank-like structure of the Camino. Even Lowa’s own Renegade GTX Mid, which we’ve found to be impressively secure on steep trails with a full pack, can’t compete with the Camino’s robust, high-cut design. If maximum support is your top priority, this is the boot to beat.
The Lowa Camino Evo GTX features a classic Vibram outsole with chunky lugs and a durable rubber compound that prioritizes longevity over stickiness. This tread design is well-suited for rugged trails, offering solid grip and good mud shedding capabilities, but it doesn’t quite match the adaptability or agility of lighter hiking boots with softer rubber compounds.
On a multi-night trip near Whistler, BC, the Camino proved reliable across a wide variety of surfaces—including maintained trails, rocky off-trail sections, snowfields, and even large water crossings. The firm rubber provided dependable traction on both wet and dry rock, and while it didn’t excel on icy patches (as expected for most non-winter boots), the performance was still commendable overall.
That said, the boot’s stiff and structured build can feel clumsy on more delicate or technical terrain. Scrambling or hopping between rocks felt less secure than with more flexible designs, like the Hoka Anacapa, which uses Vibram’s softer Megagrip rubber to better conform to uneven surfaces. In short: the Camino is a monster truck of a boot that thrives in rugged, mixed terrain, but it’s not the best match for agility-focused hikers looking for precise grip on scrambly routes.
The Lowa Camino Evo GTX immediately exudes premium build quality. From the moment you take them out of the box, the craftsmanship is evident: the full-grain leather construction is burly and reinforced with precise stitching, a thick padded collar, and a sturdy outsole. Everything about the Camino feels built to last. After extended use, the boots showed minimal wear. Just a few small scuffs were visible on the leather, and there were no signs of delamination or damage. While I noticed some cosmetic adhesive residue on the upper out of the box, the materials were securely bonded, and the misstep didn’t impact performance.
These boots are expensive at $350, but the price reflects their longevity and robust construction. With proper care, the Caminos should easily last 500 miles or more, and the outsoles can be resoled, extending their lifespan even further. For hikers and backpackers who value long-term durability and plan to cover rugged ground, the Camino stands out as one of the most hardwearing hiking boots on the market.
Protection is one of the Camino Evo GTX’s biggest strengths. With a thick full-grain leather upper, tall over-the-ankle cut, and a stiff, confidence-inspiring build, this boot is built to shield your feet from the harshest trail conditions. During a scramble up to an ice cave on a testing trip, I kicked steps into snow and brushed up against rock frequently—never once feeling discomfort or concern for my feet.
The Lowa Camino GTX also features a substantial and wide toe cap, which proved very effective when rocks slid against the front of the boot. Underfoot, the tall lugs and dual-density polyurethane midsole provide excellent shock absorption and isolation from jagged terrain. Even over extended backpacking days with a heavy pack, I could barely feel the ground beneath me. Overall, the Camino delivers best-in-class protection from top to bottom, ideal for demanding terrain and hikers who need maximum defense against trail hazards.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
PFAS-Free DWR
Durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses a PFAS-free DWR, while a red X means the DWR contains PFAS.
PFAS-Free Waterproof Membrane
The membranes used in waterproof products such as rain jackets, ski jackets, and shoes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are valued for their resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product’s waterproof membrane is PFAS-free, while a red X means it contains PFAS.
Responsible Leather
Responsible leather is typically sourced from suppliers certified by the Leather Working Group (LWG), a third-party nonprofit that evaluates tanneries on factors such as water and energy use, chemical and waste management, emissions, traceability, and worker safety, and assigns ratings ranging from Bronze to Gold. A green check mark indicates a product uses responsibly sourced leather, a yellow check mark indicates the brand sources responsible leather for the majority of its products but does not specify it at the product level, and a red X indicates the product does not use responsibly sourced leather.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
The men’s Lowa Camino Evo GTX tips the scales at a hefty 3 pounds 8.4 ounces per pair, making it one of the heaviest hiking boots on the market. For comparison, even the burly Salomon Quest 4 GTX—no featherweight itself—comes in around 10 ounces lighter per pair. While the Quest offers slightly less support and structure overall, the difference in weight is significant and will be noticeable over long miles.
Of course, weight isn’t the top priority for those shopping for a boot like the Camino. It’s built for maximum support, durability, and protection, and those benefits inevitably come with a tradeoff in heft. Still, the old adage “a pound on your feet equals five on your back” rings true here: you will work harder mile after mile with nearly two pounds on each foot. For some backpackers and mountain travelers, that’s a fair trade. But for most recreational hikers, it’s worth considering whether the Camino’s tank-like build is truly necessary.
Waterproof Liner
The Lowa Camino Evo GTX uses a Gore-Tex waterproof liner, a trusted and proven material in outdoor footwear. In our testing, the liner provided excellent water protection during stream crossings (it’s tall ankle height and gusseted tongue provide impressive defense against water intrusion), slushy snow travel, and all-day rain, keeping feet dry throughout. Breathability, as with most Gore-Tex designs—and particularly one with a full leather upper—is negatively impacted, and these boots run warm in hot summer conditions. That said, for mountain environments or cooler shoulder-season trips, it’s a fine balance.
Lacing System
The Camino’s standout lacing system is one of its most well-executed features. It uses a unique two-zone design that allows you to independently tighten the lower and upper portions of the boot, giving you the ability to customize the fit based on terrain, foot swelling, or personal preference. Locking eyelets hold tension in place as you transition from the lower foot to the ankle zone, and the laces thread through metal hardware that feels both durable and smooth in operation.
This lacing system directly contributes to the boot’s stellar support and protection ratings. During our testing, it made a real difference in dialing in heel hold and reducing foot movement within the boot—particularly important in steep or uneven terrain. The lacing tension also held securely throughout long days without frequent readjustment. For a stiff, high-cut boot, having such precise control over the fit is a critical upside and one that sets the Camino apart from many competitors.
The Lowa Camino GTX runs true to size, with a fit that’s slightly roomier than average—especially in the toe box. I typically wear a men’s size 13 boot (sometimes 14), and based on prior experience with Lowa’s Renegade GTX Mid in a 13 Wide, I opted for a standard 13 in the Camino. That choice worked out well: The fit was spot on, and the added toe space allowed my toes to splay naturally and accommodated some foot swelling over long days. This extra room is a thoughtful touch for backpackers logging long miles with heavy loads.
As mentioned above, Lowa’s signature X-Lacing system also stood out. Designed to reduce tongue slippage and improve heel hold, the system does a great job of locking the foot in place. While I usually rely on a manual heel-lock lacing technique, I found the Camino’s built-in lacing design accomplished the same effect with less fuss. The result was a snug, secure fit through the heel that helped reduce movement and potential hot spots, rounding out a dialed-in and highly customizable fit.
Salomon Quest 4 GTX ($230): A Lighter Heavy Hitter
The class of true heavyweight hiking boots is small, and one of the best-sellers is the Salomon Quest 4 GTX. Like the Lowa Camino Evo, the Quest features a high, over-the-ankle cut and offers excellent traction and protection for tough trails and heavy packs. On the other hand, the upper of the Quest 4 GTX is a synthetic/leather hybrid that isn’t quite as supportive or supple as the all-leather Lowa, and the build quality isn’t up to the same level either. But the Salomon is considerably lighter at 2 pounds 14 ounces, and cheaper at $230. We tend to favor lighter-weight hiking boots, but both are purpose-built for those who want the ultimate levels of support, protection, and traction. For more, read our review of the Salomon Quest 4 GTX.
Lowa Renegade Evo GTX ($265): Enough Boot? Maybe...
For Lowa enthusiasts, we’d be remiss not to mention the more svelte Renegade Evo GTX as an alternative to the hefty Camino Evo GTX. We aren’t here to change the minds of those who love over-the-ankle, heavyweight boots, but the Renegade is a super capable option that is a heckuva lot lighter (2 pounds 9.6 ounces) and cheaper ($265) than the Camino. In our testing, the Renegades were confidence-inspiring and supportive while carrying a heavy pack over steep, rocky terrain, without being overly stiff like the Camino. There is a time and a place for the Camino, but if you plan on covering longer distances or using your boots on more moderate terrain, there’s a good argument for lightening things up with the more versatile and approachable Renegade. For more, see our Lowa Renegade review.
With a jaw-dropping price point and weight, the Camino certainly isn’t for everyone. But if you are looking for the ultimate in support and craftsmanship, it’s a high-quality option.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
For the roughest of terrain, the Quest is a burly and tough hiker with excellent waterproofing to boot. That said, it’s heavy and overkill for most conditions.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
The Renegade isn’t the lightest boot out there and has a classic leather design, but remains comfortable and highly capable. For challenging day hikes and backpacking, it’s a practical choice.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
If you prioritize support, durability, and protection for demanding hikes or heavy backpacking loads, the Lowa Camino GTX is a top performer. Its tall, stiff build and locking laces offer unmatched stability, and the boot is built to last over hundreds of miles. That said, it’s extremely heavy, stiff underfoot, and requires a real break-in period—most recreational hikers will be better served by a lighter option like Lowa’s own Renegade (and even that hiking boot is relatively heavy by modern standards). But for those seeking a rugged, confidence-inspiring boot for serious terrain, the Camino Evo is one of the most capable choices available.
hit the trail
Gear Guide
Best Hiking Shoes of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Daypacks of 2026Gear Guide
Best Trekking Poles of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Pants of 2026Gear Guide
Best Synthetic Insulated Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Rain Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Down Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Fleece Jackets of 2026curated for you