Get Better Trail in your inbox.

Subscribe here.
MENU

Garmin Forerunner 165 Review: Worth it at a Discount?

ByJonas Hill
Jun 29, 2026
When you buy through our links, we may receive a commission.
Our Take:
4.5/5

The Garmin Forerunner 165 (discounted to $200 following the release of the Forerunner 170) is a capable and well-rounded entry-level training watch, ideal for daily training in the frontcountry. It offers accurate tracking in all but the most challenging environments and hosts the best of Garmin's smart features alongside a polished health and recovery suite. The limitations that come with the entry-level price tag—below-average battery life, basic materials, rudimentary navigation, and a lack of advanced training metrics—are real, but for most users, they're easy to live with. If you just want a reliable watch to track activities and sleep without paying for features you'll never use, the Forerunner 165 is one of the best options at this price point.

User Experience

User Experience

4.5/5
Activity Tracking & Training

Activity Tracking & Training

4/5
Health & Recovery

Health & Recovery

4.5/5
Mapping & Navigation

Mapping & Navigation

2.5/5
Quality & Durability

Quality & Durability

2.5/5
Battery Life

Battery Life

3.5/5

Battery life (w/ GPS)

19 hours

Battery life (smartwatch)

11 days

Display

AMOLED

Lens

Glass

Bezel

Fiber-reinforced polymer

Diameter

43mm

Weight

39g

Mapping

Breadcrumb

Band material

Silicone

Pros

Everything most watch users need at a discounted price.
The best of Garmin’s smart features, including contactless pay, text notifications, and music control.
Polished and intuitive health and recovery ecosystem.

Cons

Battery life is below average.
The lack of topographic mapping makes it a poor choice for backcountry use.
Basic materials aren’t as durable or scratch-resistant as higher-end alternatives.

For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Running Watches. 

Like most of Garmin's offerings, the Forerunner 165 is just about the best in class when it comes to user experience. The watch pairs a bright, modern AMOLED touchscreen with a five-button layout, giving you plenty of options for navigating its features. You can lean on the touchscreen for everyday use or rely entirely on the buttons during activities, and you can disable or lock the screen if needed. Between the two input methods, navigating the watch is easy in just about any condition, whether you're mid-run, caught in the rain, or scrolling through menus at home.


Coming from years of using Coros watches, I found the Garmin ecosystem a little different at first, but it didn't take long to click. If anything, it felt more built out and robust than what I was used to—there's simply more data on offer, and the overall experience feels more polished and feature-rich. The Garmin Connect app paired seamlessly and synced reliably, with no issues keeping everything organized across devices.

In terms of smart features, the Garmin Forerunner 165 covers the essentials without the full suite found on Garmin's higher-end models. It offers Find My Phone, Garmin Pay, a morning report, weather forecasts, and the ability to control smartphone music and receive texts. That said, unlike the Forerunner 570 and 970, there's no on-watch music storage and no microphone, so you can't take calls from your wrist.

The Forerunner 165 is a capable training watch that covers the activities most runners and endurance athletes actually care about. Garmin lists over 25 activity profiles, and you can customize existing profiles and build your own from scratch. The sensor suite—which includes GPS, a barometric altimeter, compass, gyroscope, and accelerometer—delivers accurate, reliable tracking across all of them.


I primarily used the watch for trail running, strength training, and hiking, and it performed well across the board. GPS tracking was consistent and reliable, and in my experience, the accuracy felt comparable to the Coros Pace 4, with neither watch pulling meaningfully ahead. Syncing to Strava was seamless and automatic. I didn't lean heavily on the more advanced training features like VO2 max or structured workouts, although they're there if you want them, which is a surprising amount of capability for an entry-level watch.

But of course, there are some meaningful downgrades compared to a higher-end Forerunner like the 570 or 970. The 165 lacks multi-band GPS, which offers greater accuracy in challenging environments like dense urban areas or deep canyons. It also doesn't support multi-sport profiles, making it a poor fit for triathletes or anyone wanting to log multiple activities in a single session. And it skips the advanced training metrics found on pricier running watches—real-time stamina, endurance score, and a handful of niche running analytics. But for most athletes simply logging their daily training, it more than gets the job done.

Health and recovery tracking is one of Garmin's genuine strengths, and it's on full display even on the entry-level Forerunner 165. In fact, it’s where I noticed the biggest difference compared to the Coros Pace 4. Under the hood, the watch tracks everything from wrist-based heart rate and sleep to HRV status and recovery time, and on the front end, it's laid out in a thoughtful, well-integrated way. For example, the watch links sleep quality directly to recovery time, making it easy to understand why a rough night translates to a slower bounce-back.


One notable omission is Garmin's training readiness score, a feature found on higher-end models like the Forerunner 570 and 970. Training readiness pulls together sleep quality, HRV status, recovery time, training load, and stress into a single, actionable score. The Garmin Forerunner 165 tracks all of those inputs individually but doesn't synthesize them into that top-line number. In its place, the body battery score—which tracks overall daily energy on a scale of 1 to 100—fills a similar role for everyday use, even if it's a less sophisticated tool for evaluating workout readiness specifically.

One interesting call out is that when I got sick during testing, my watch clearly knew before I did, showing my HRV dropping dramatically. But for the most part, the health and recovery data served more as a curiosity to me than as a decision-making tool. I’m already fairly in tune with my body, and I never made hard training decisions based on what the watch told me. But as an additional data point—a second opinion on how I was doing—the Forerunner 165 offered more depth and nuance than I expected from an entry-level watch.

Mapping and navigation are clear weak points for the Forerunner 165, which is an intentional omission given the watch's frontcountry focus. In short, if you want a watch with any sort of helpful mapping functionality, it’s best to look elsewhere.


The Forerunner 165 offers breadcrumb navigation, which shows a GPS line and a dot indicating your position on a blank screen, without any underlying map layers or topographic context. You can view your position relative to a route you've uploaded or recorded, or follow your line back to where you started, but that's about it. Without topo layers to reference, there's no meaningful way to orient yourself or make navigation decisions in unfamiliar terrain.

If you’ve ever experienced this sort of wrist-based mapping, it’s almost more trouble than it’s worth. I could see it coming in handy in a worst-case scenario—say, you're socked in with fog and need to retrace your steps—but beyond that, the use cases are narrow. If mapping matters to you, this is one of the strongest arguments for stepping up to a watch with full topographic maps, like the Garmin Forerunner 970 or Coros Apex 4, both of which offer offline topo maps that rival dedicated apps like Gaia.

Build quality is another key areas where premium running watches differentiate themselves from the entry-level market. The Forerunner 165’s make-up is as basic as it gets in the running watch space: a fiber-reinforced polymer case and bezel, chemically strengthened glass, and a silicone band. For reference, high-end watches like the Forerunner 970 and Coros Apex 4 use premium components like titanium or sapphire crystal, which are less vulnerable to scratches and wear. The Forerunner 165’s material set is virtually identical to the Coros Pace 4 and still feels solid and well-built for the price. For frontcountry uses that aren't especially hard on gear, it should hold up just fine.

Garmin rates the Garmin Forerunner 165 for up to 11 days in smartwatch mode and up to 19 hours in GPS mode, and in my testing, those numbers felt about right. I rarely took the watch off—just to shower—and used it to record all 10 to 14 hours of weekly activity. With that kind of use, I got about nine days before needing to recharge. On one occasion, I tested it side by side with the Coros Pace 4, and the Pace 4 still had 38 percent battery remaining when the Forerunner died. At least the watch charges quickly, taking just 60 to 90 minutes for a full charge.


Coming from Coros watches (I also tested the Apex 4, which gets a whopping 24 days in smartwatch mode and 65 hours in GPS mode), the Forerunner 165's battery life felt unimpressive. But for an entry-level watch, it's completely serviceable and all most users will need. And if you want to stretch it further, battery-saving modes are available to help extend the life between charges.

Select icon to view details:

Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon

Longevity

Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.

The Forerunner 165 is a compact, lightweight watch that disappears on the wrist, making it easy to wear all day. It comes in one single 43-millimeter size, which worked well for my relatively small wrist and should accommodate a wide range of wrist sizes comfortably. With a sleek 11.6-millimeter height, it's similar in size and feel to the Coros Pace 4 and noticeably more low-profile than watches like the Forerunner 570 and Fenix 8 (both of which are taller at 12.9 and 13.8 millimeters, respectively). I found the Forerunner 165 comfortable for 24/7 wear, including sleep, which certainly can’t be said about all watches.

Garmin offers the watch in two colorways, both of which come with a silicone band. If strap variety matters to you, the Coros Pace 4 has a leg up, offering both silicone and nylon options.

Coros Pace 4 ($249): No-Frills Function
The Coros Pace 4 and the Forerunner 165 occupy nearly identical territory—same MSRP, same size, same target audience—and in head-to-head testing, they tracked activities with comparable accuracy. Where they diverge is in priorities. The Pace 4 offers almost twice the battery life, while the Forerunner 165 shines with a broader suite of smart features. Garmin's ecosystem is hard to beat if you like the idea of a smartphone on your wrist: The Forerunner 165 comes packed with features like contactless payments, meditation and breathwork sessions, and music streaming compatibility (if you bump up to the Forerunner 165 Music model). For runners who want a more polished everyday experience, the Forerunner has the edge. For those who prioritize battery life and a cleaner, no-frills interface, the Pace 4 is the stronger pick. For more, read our Coros Pace 4 review.


Garmin Forerunner 70 ($250): Newer But Not Better
If you’re reading this and the Garmin Forerunner 165 is still available for purchase, it’s a no-brainer to go for it over the newer and more basic Forerunner 70. Garmin’s true entry-level watch in 2026, the Forerunner 70 lacks key sensors like a barometric altimeter, compass, gyroscope, and thermometer, along with big-ticket items like GarminPay and music control. It does get the leg up in battery life (with up to 13 days in smartwatch mode and 23 hours in GPS mode), but that’s about where it ends in terms of upgrades over the 165.


Garmin Forerunner 170 ($300): The Modern Upgrade
Garmin often releases new models without discontinuing the old, and the 170 is the direct successor to the 165. It shares much of the same design, but adds helpful training and recovery metrics like Training Status, wrist-based Running Power, and the Training Readiness score, which synthesizes sleep, HRV, recovery time, and training load into a single actionable number. It also adds a gyroscope for improved activity tracking accuracy. At full price, the $50 gap is easy to justify for dedicated runners who will actually use those additional metrics. At the 165's discounted price of $200, though, the calculus shifts, and for most users, the 165 covers the bases at a meaningful discount.

Garmin Forerunner 165 ($200)
Wearing Garmin Forerunner 165 Running Watch
4.5/5

The Forerunner 165 is a capable entry-level training watch that delivers all most users need to hit the trail, road, or track, at a discounted price of $200. Battery life, mapping, and build quality are the expected entry-level compromises, so we'd keep it to frontcountry use.

Battery life (w/ GPS)
19 hours
Battery life (smartwatch)
11 days
Display
AMOLED
Lens
Glass
Bezel
Fiber-reinforced polymer
Diameter
43mm
Weight
39g
Mapping
Breadcrumb
Band material
Silicone
Icon

User Experience

4.5/5
Icon

Activity Tracking & Training

4/5
Icon

Health & Recovery

4.5/5
Icon

Mapping & Navigation

2.5/5
Icon

Quality & Durability

2.5/5
Icon

Battery Life

3.5/5
Coros Pace 4 ($249)
Run activity mode on the Coros Pace 4 running watch
4.8/5

One of the best values among running watches, the Pace 4 delivers GPS accuracy and battery life that rival models priced three times higher. Its lightweight, streamlined design is ideal for road and track runners. Just don’t expect ultra-durable materials, topographic mapping, or robust smart features.

Battery life (w/ GPS)
41 hours
Battery life (smartwatch)
19 days
Display
AMOLED
Lens
Mineral glass
Bezel
Fiber-reinforced polymer
Diameter
43.4mm
Weight
40g (32g w/ nylon band)
Mapping
Breadcrumb
Band material
Silicone or nylon
Icon

User Experience

4.5/5
Icon

Activity Tracking & Training

4/5
Icon

Health & Recovery

4.5/5
Icon

Mapping & Navigation

2.5/5
Icon

Quality & Durability

2.5/5
Icon

Battery Life

3.5/5
Suunto Race 2 ($499)
Holding Suunto Race 2 running watch in air
4.5/5

A high-end training watch without the Garmin price tag, the Race 2 combines excellent battery life, full topographic mapping, and a durable yet sleek build. It’s not the most polished or intuitive option, though, and it lacks many common smartwatch features.

Battery life (w/ GPS)
65 hours
Battery life (smartwatch)
18 days
Display
AMOLED
Lens
Sapphire crystal
Bezel
Stainless steel
Diameter
49mm
Weight
76g
Mapping
Topographic
Band material
Silicone
Icon

User Experience

3.5/5
Icon

Activity Tracking & Training

4/5
Icon

Health & Recovery

3.5/5
Icon

Mapping & Navigation

4/5
Icon

Quality & Durability

4/5
Icon

Battery Life

4.5/5

Is the Forerunner 165 for You?

The Garmin Forerunner 165 is a great entry-level training watch for recreational runners, cyclists, swimmers, gym-goers, and general movement enthusiasts. It's best suited for frontcountry use, where its below-average battery life and basic build quality won't hold it back. It's also a strong option for anyone looking for a simple daily wearable that combines activity tracking with smart features (like contactless pay and text notifications) and solid sleep and recovery metrics. The single 43-millimeter size is easy to wear around the clock, though it may feel small on larger wrists.


At its original $250 price point, the Forerunner 165 was a tough sell against the Coros Pace 4, which offers nearly twice the battery life in a comparable package (albeit with a few less smart features). At its current discounted price of around $200, though, it becomes a much more compelling option.

Go for it if you want a simple, reliable watch for daily training, everyday use, and sleep tracking, and don't plan on taking it deep into the backcountry.


Pass on it if you prioritize battery life, need topographic mapping, or want the advanced training metrics found on higher-end Forerunners.