Updated:
Jan 19, 2025Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Moderate
Weight
2 lb. 4 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Leather
Pros
Cons
Danner Mountain 600 Leaf GTX
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Hiking Boots.
I wore the Danner Mountain 600 Leaf right out of the box on a five-night backpacking trip in the high country of Colorado’s Weminuche Wilderness. While I wouldn’t normally recommend going from zero to 60 with a full-leather boot, the Mountain 600 proved surprisingly comfortable with no break-in period. The boot’s midsole struck an effective balance: Not so firm that it caused heel soreness, but not so soft that it lacked stability. The Mountain 600 remained comfortable throughout the long days linking up rocky talus and valley swamps, even under the load of my 35-pound pack.
I’ve worn several other hiking boots, and the Danner Mountain 600 Leaf beats them all in terms of comfort. The boot felt better on my feet than the Oboz Bridger Mid Waterproof (which features a similar amount of underfoot cushion) and offers significantly more comfort than the stiffer Keen Pyrenees Waterproof. And although it doesn’t affect performance, the Mountain 600 is the most aesthetically pleasing boot I’ve ever worn—feeling fly is a different kind of comfort, but comfort nonetheless.
I tend to feel unsteady on the trail and wouldn’t consider myself particularly agile. However, the Mountain 600 quickly earned my trust. The boot’s midsole is well-balanced—not too stiff but still supportive—while the nylon shank and TPU heel frame add sturdiness around the foot. What's more, the ankle support is flexible enough to allow intentional tilting, yet stiff enough to stabilize against unintended ankle rolls. For comparison’s sake, the stiffer Salomon Quest 4 GTX offers slightly more stability, but the flipside is that the Mountain 600 is more precise, due to having more flex underfoot. The boot felt stout through five days of high-alpine talus terrain, allowing me to explore 13,000-foot peaks and basins with confidence. Even with a full 35-pound pack, it handled the weight with ease.
The Mountain 600 Leaf has a Vibram Fuga outsole, which features Vibram's tried-and-true Megagrip rubber along with well-spaced medium-sized lugs (Danner advertises these as “self-adapting,” which we’ve been unable to clarify). It maintained a reliable grip throughout river crossings, talus fields, and scree fields; I felt confident scrambling over class 3 terrain and had no qualms about walking up and down rock slabs. In mud, the outsole performed about average: I trudged through slick conditions for a full day and had my fair share of slips, but no more than I would with other hiking boots. I’d want more aggressive lugs if I planned to hike frequently in mud (a good idea if you live somewhere like Hawaii), but the Mountain 600 is a solid choice for most rocky, snowy, and hard-packed terrain.
I’ve worn my pair of Mountain 600 boots for about 150 miles of difficult alpine terrain and wet environments, and it’s emerged mostly intact and ready for more adventures. As expected, its Vibram outsole has held up well, and aside from the typical scuffs and creases, the leather upper remains unscathed. The only area of concern is the toe guard—an extension of the outsole that wraps up the front of the boot—which is starting to show a couple of millimeters of separation. While this doesn’t affect the performance, it seems likely to separate further with continued use. The good news is that minor problems like this can always be remedied with a bit of shoe glue.
Notably, Danner offers recrafting services for the Danner Mountain 600 Leaf, a rare option for hiking boots. A full rebuild will cost $280, and re-soling will cost between $100 and $140. If you did a double-take, it’s true: The rebuilding price is higher than the price of the boot. But for those who value sustainability, opting for this service can save many of the boot’s parts from going to the landfill, which seems like a good place to put your money. As someone who envies my European friends who regularly send in their worn-out boots to be resoled, I’m excited to give this service a try.
The Mountain 600 provides above-average foot protection. The toe cap, a continuation of the outsole that covers just the tip of the toe, was an effective barrier against trail hazards—I felt no pain when I kicked rocks or tripped over roots. Despite having no extra reinforcements on the side (many hiking boots feature a rubber rand just above the midsole), the thick leather upper was sufficiently protective as I “skied” down unstable scree and talus fields. Underfoot, the sturdy outsole, nylon shank, and moderately firm midsole allowed me to trudge over loose rock and scree without any hesitation.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
PFAS-Free DWR
Durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses a PFAS-free DWR, while a red X means the DWR contains PFAS.
PFAS-Free Waterproof Membrane
The membranes used in waterproof products such as rain jackets, ski jackets, and shoes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are valued for their resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product’s waterproof membrane is PFAS-free, while a red X means it contains PFAS.
Responsible Leather
Responsible leather is typically sourced from suppliers certified by the Leather Working Group (LWG), a third-party nonprofit that evaluates tanneries on factors such as water and energy use, chemical and waste management, emissions, traceability, and worker safety, and assigns ratings ranging from Bronze to Gold. A green check mark indicates a product uses responsibly sourced leather, a yellow check mark indicates the brand sources responsible leather for the majority of its products but does not specify it at the product level, and a red X indicates the product does not use responsibly sourced leather.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
The Mountain 600 falls solidly in the midweight hiking boot category. At 2 pounds 4 ounces for the women's pair, its weight is on par with hiking boots such as the Oboz Bridger Mid Waterproof (2 lb. 3.4 oz.) and Keen Pyrenees Waterproof (2 lb. 4 oz.), both of which have similar backpacking appeal. These competitors offer more stability due to their firmer midsoles, but that comes at the expense of comfort. For a heavier model, the Salewa Mountain Trainer Mid Gore-Tex (2 lb. 8.2 oz.) is an approach-focused boot with a thicker, grippier outsole than the Mountain 600. On the flip side, you can save a lot of weight with a trail running-leaning design such as the Merrell Moab Speed 2 Mid GTX (1 lb. 8.7 oz.), but you’ll compromise stability and durability.
Waterproof Liner
The Mountain 600’s Gore-Tex liner kept my feet dry in moderate rain and when I partially submerged my foot during a creek crossing. However, on my next outing, moisture seeped through after a full day of hiking on muddy trails. In my opinion, a leather boot like the Mountain 600 isn’t ideal for long days in wet conditions given that leather can grow very heavy when overwhelmed by moisture, even if the Gore-Tex membrane is effective. What’s more, the Mountain 600’s waterproof construction means it can quickly grow stuffy and clammy, although that’s to be expected in a hiking boot with this build and weight. It did feel more breathable than the Bridger, which I’ve found to be more effective at keeping water out.
Lacing System
Throughout scrambling, river crossings, and dozens of trail miles, the Mountain 600’s laces kept my feet secure and stable. I’ve always had issues with my laces coming undone several times a day with previous boots, but the Mountain 600’s lacing design felt magical. The boot features a full set of metal eyelets, with a D-ring shape for the majority of the eyelets and hooks for the top two. This is an extremely durable design—no need to worry about fabric eyelets wearing out—and the laces felt secure. As with all boots, I would readjust my laces to refine the fit shortly after starting each morning, but I was impressed that I never had to re-tie the laces after the initial adjustment.
Not only does the Mountain 600 come with flat laces, but Danner also includes spare round laces, too. Since the preinstalled flat laces worked well for me and held up, I have yet to try the round ones.
I typically wear a women’s size 9.5, and the Danner Mountain 600 Leaf fit true to size. Danner recommends sizing down if you’re between sizes, but I’m happy I stuck with my standard size. The heel fits snugly without slipping and the midfoot is well-supported. I did experience a slight pinch in my pinky toes when I descended steep slopes, which could have been a combination of foot swelling and the consistent downhill grade. For hikers who prefer a roomy toe box or have high-volume feet, the boot also comes in a wide version.
Asolo Falcon Evo GV ($275): A More Nimble Synthetic Boot
The Asolo Falcon Evo GV excels in areas the Mountain 600 falls short, highlighted by its agile and breathable design. Asolo intelligently pairs a mesh upper with leather reinforcements at the heel and around the perimeter; combined with the Gore-Tex Extended Comfort waterproof membrane, the result is a lot more airflow than you get with a full leather boot. At 2 pounds 2.6 ounces for the women’s pair, the Falcon is not significantly lighter than the Mountain 600, but we’ve experienced it as a more nimble, athletic hiking boot—one of our testers was nervous to try it fearing it would be too overbuilt for her taste, and was pleasantly surprised by its flexible yet capable build. And while Danner falls short in many of our sustainability metrics (despite its recrafting service), Asolo fares notably better, including a commitment to recycled or reduced packaging and transparency via an annual impact report. For a deeper dive, see our Asolo Falcon GV review.
Lowa Renegade Evo GTX ($265): Functional Leather Standard
The Danner Mountain 600 is built with an eye for aesthetics and sustainability, but for a function-first leather boot, take a look at the Lowa Renegade GTX. Like the Mountain 600, the Renegade features a full-leather upper, Gore-Tex waterproofing, and a Vibram outsole (Vibram Evo vs. the Danner’s Vibram Megagrip), but there are also several differences. At 5 ounces less for the pair, the Renegade offers a better balance of weight and performance. It also features more reinforcements around the exterior of the foot, which translates to better protection against stubs and increased durability. Sustainability-wise, the Renegade has very little going for it, although you can certainly get them resoled at your local cobbler. We recommend trying both shoes on before you buy, but your final decision will likely come down to appearance and price. For more, read our review of the Lowa Renegade GTX.
Yes, this boot is cool on the outside, but it has real performance chops to back it up. With impressive comfort, stability, and grip at a reasonable weight, there is a lot to like about the 600 Leaf.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
For backpacking in moderate terrain and potentially wet conditions, the Falcon is a solid all-around hiking boot with a quality build. We appreciate the comfort and padding but wish the traction were a bit more substantial to match the rest of the boot’s capabilities.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
The Renegade isn’t the lightest boot out there and has a classic design, but remains comfortable and highly capable. For challenging day hikes and backpacking, it’s a practical choice.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Despite being initially skeptical of a hiking boot that seemed built to capitalize on Instagram-worthy aesthetics, we were pleasantly surprised by the on-trail performance of the Danner Mountain 600 Leaf GTX. Not only is the boot stylish, it boasts an impressive build quality, dependable traction, and more than enough support to schlep a large multiday pack. Hikers who aim for long treks, carry heavy loads, or feel personally attacked by sharp rocks and roots will appreciate the Mountain 600’s combination of comfort, stability, and protection. Even at $220, it offers plenty of long-term value.
hit the trail
Gear Guide
Best Hiking Shoes of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Daypacks of 2026Gear Guide
Best Trekking Poles of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Pants of 2026Gear Guide
Best Synthetic Insulated Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Rain Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Down Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Fleece Jackets of 2026curated for you