Merrell Moab Speed 2 Mid GTX Sustainability Report

The Moab Speed 2 Mid features a mesh-heavy synthetic upper that emphasizes weight savings over ruggedness. The Vibram outsole offers good grip but will wear faster than harder rubber compounds, and the soft, exposed foam will scuff over time. The boot will last for at least a season of hard use, but expect a much shorter lifespan than you’d get with a leather design.

Choosing durable outdoor gear is perhaps the most effective way to reduce environmental impact—the longer it lasts, the less it needs to be produced. Our proprietary longevity rating evaluates overall build quality based on factors such as materials, fabric denier, component durability (including zippers and toggles), real-world performance as reported by our field testers, and our experiences with the brand. Overall, we feel strongly that reducing overall consumption is a cornerstone of sustainability.

The laces, webbing, mesh lining, and footbed cover in the Merrell Moab Speed 2 Mid GTX are made of 100% recycled materials. The footbed also contains 50% recycled EVA foam. Recycled materials are incorporated throughout Merrell’s product line, including in the uppers and laces of many of its shoes. While Merrell does not disclose the total percentage of recycled content across its products, it has set a goal for 100% of its products to feature organic, recycled, or renewable materials by 2025.

Outdoor gear can be made partly or entirely from recycled materials, the most common being nylon, polyester, wool, and down. Some products include a single recycled component or a partially recycled fabric, while others are 100% recycled (generally excluding accessories like zippers, Velcro, toggles, etc.). For our sustainability ratings, we evaluate the amount of recycled materials in a particular product and assign points accordingly.

The durable water-repellent (DWR) treatment on the Speed 2 Mid is PFAS free. Merrell’s parent company, Wolverine Worldwide, set a goal to eliminate PFAS from all products by the fall/winter 2024 season. While the company does not publicly disclose PFAS content in its products, it confirmed with us that all fall/winter 2025 products are PFAS free.

The DWR (Durable Water Repellent) finish is a product’s direct defense against outside moisture, and commonly contains PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These synthetic compounds, known as "forever chemicals,” are found in a range of gear categories, from jackets to footwear. They resist water, oil, and heat exceptionally well, making them ideal for outdoor use, but their nearly indestructible nature also means that they take an extremely long time to degrade in nature, if at all. PFAS can eventually end up in everything from soil to drinking water and have been linked to a range of health issues.

The waterproof membrane on the Moab Speed 2 Mid GTX is PFAS free, which tracks with Wolverine Worldwide’s commitment to banning PFAS from all of its products.

The membranes of certain waterproof products, including rain jackets, ski jackets, ski bibs, hardshells, and hiking footwear, commonly contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These synthetic compounds, known as "forever chemicals,” resist water, oil, and heat exceptionally well, making them ideal for outdoor use, but their nearly indestructible nature also means that they take an extremely long time to degrade in nature, if at all. PFAS can eventually end up in everything from soil to drinking water and have been linked to a range of health issues.

There are no Bluesign-approved materials in the Moab Speed 2 Mid. Furthermore, Merrell is not a Bluesign System Partner, and we have not seen any Bluesign-approved materials in the shoes that Better Trail has reviewed.

Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile certification system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A Bluesign-approved material indicates that it has undergone a rigorous vetting process based on the criteria above. A Bluesign Product goes the next mile, containing at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and at least 30% Bluesign-approved accessories.

Merrell’s parent company, Wolverine Worldwide, maintains a code of conduct for its suppliers. However, that alone does not meet our criteria for responsible manufacturing practices. To meet our responsible manufacturing criteria, we require brands to be part of a third-party program that provides certification and/or annual audits of factories to ensure safe working conditions, fair wages, and a decreased environmental impact.

This criterion evaluates a brand's commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing its environmental impact throughout the production process. Responsible manufacturing is most commonly demonstrated through certifications and membership in programs such as Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accreditation of Production, and the Fair Labor Association. We also recognize brands that prioritize local production, such as those that manufacture primarily in the United States or Europe, to reduce carbon emissions, maintain better oversight of working conditions, and comply with strict social and environmental regulations.

All Wolverine Worldwide subsidiary companies use Forest Steward Council Recycled or Mix (recycled and virgin) packaging for their products. The Forest Stewardship Council certifies that wood and paper products are sourced from responsibly managed forests that protect forest ecosystems, reduce climate impact, and minimize chemical use while protecting worker welfare and indigenous rights.

Packaging can add significant waste to an outdoor gear purchase and often ends up in landfills. Many brands are using recycled packaging and/or making efforts to reduce packaging altogether. For example, they may use a certain percentage of recycled cardboard or make efforts to use less plastic or paper across their packaging operation. In some cases, brands also use Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, which helps to ensure sustainable sourcing of forest materials.

Merrell does not offer resale or recycling services for its footwear.

Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation for longer and out of landfills. The most common form is a trade-in program, where consumers can exchange items for store credit, which is then resold. Some brands accept products back for recycling at the end of their life, thereby reducing waste. Occasionally, some do both.

Wolverine Worldwide, Merrell’s parent company, tracks its greenhouse gas emissions using the Higg Index tools.

This criterion evaluates whether this brand measures its greenhouse gas emissions, along with its commitment to reduction and transparency in reporting. Typically, we require brands to follow established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. Most companies use the widely recognized scope categorization system for measuring brand emissions. Those who earn the most points in this category have emissions reduction goals verified by the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi), a global organization that helps companies set greenhouse gas reduction targets in line with the goal of limiting global warming to well below 2°C. To verify their goals through SBTi, companies undergo a rigorous assessment process and continual follow-up to ensure consistent progress towards achieving their targets.

Wolverine Worldwide, Merrell's parent company, publishes an annual impact report. The report covers many of our criteria but is lacking in substantial data. However, it does include some sustainability information specific to Merrell, which is not always the case when a parent company produces an impact report.

An impact report is an important step toward transparency and accountability on the sustainability front. These reports vary in form but generally cover topics such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions tracking, waste and water usage, supply chain analysis, and packaging efforts. For our sustainability ratings, we evaluate this criterion based on the depth and quality of the information provided in the report, and how often it is produced. Some brands produce their own impact report, while others are published by their parent company. In practice, we’ve found that reports produced by individual brands include more detailed information about their sustainability efforts.