Best Men's Winter Jackets of 2026
Updated:
Jan 15, 2026Table of contents
Your everyday winter coat might not inspire the same gear debates as other categories, but it’s a cornerstone of any cold-weather kit—and likely the piece you’ll wear the most. To bring you our top recommendations for 2026, our team has tested, rated, compared, and photographed these jackets through multiple winters of real-world use, evaluating warmth, weather protection, comfort, features, and overall performance. As you compare, you can use our interface to sort by key traits and browse our in-depth photo galleries. And for a deeper dive, be sure to check out our ratings explainers, jacket anatomy breakdown, and FAQs below the reviews.
Winter Jacket Superlatives
Patagonia Jackson Glacier ($499)
REI Co-op Stormhenge 850 Down Hybrid ($279)
Rab Neutrino Pro ($450)
Fjallraven Expedition ($800)
Arc'teryx Ralle Down Parka ($900)
Patagonia Stormshadow Parka ($899)
The North Face McMurdo Parka ($400)
Our Winter Jacket Picks
This well-constructed coat exhibits all the hallmarks of Patagonia quality at a reasonable price (well, reasonable for the category, at least). The Jackson Glacier isn’t as warm or waterproof as more premium models, but it’ll get the job done in the majority of winter conditions.
This well-constructed coat exhibits all the hallmarks of Patagonia quality at a reasonable price (well, reasonable for the category, at least). The Jackson Glacier isn’t as warm or waterproof as more premium models, but it’ll get the job done in the majority of winter conditions.
Warmth
Comfort
Weather Protection
Storage
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
2 lb. 3.2 oz.
Insulation
6.6 oz. of 700-fill down
Waterproofing
2-layer H2No Performance Standard
Back Length
31 in.
Pros
Cons
At $499, the Jackson Glacier hits the middle of the winter jacket market, in a good way. Using Patagonia’s proprietary H2No waterproofing instead of Gore-Tex helps make that possible, but this coat still contains decently lofty 700-fill down and features Patagonia’s customarily excellent construction. Our tester said that it kept him comfortable while he indulged in parking lot ski day aprés in temps ranging from the low 20s to the mid-30s, but there are warmer (and more expensive) competitors such as the Fjallraven Expedition ($800) and Patagonia’s own Stormshadow ($899). Still, the Jackson Glacier’s insulation should be enough for most people in normal winter conditions, and we’re always big fans of saving hundreds of dollars from one piece of gear to another.
We appreciate all of the testing feedback we receive here at Better Trail, but some anecdotes stand out. That’s the case with the Jackson Glacier Jacket, which successfully survived clearing snow from a driveway in a blizzard on notoriously soggy Snoqualmie Pass, Washington. Our tester reported that the snow bounced right off the coat’s 2-layer H2No fabric, and that rain never soaked through when temps rose. Performance like that—and the fact that the thick polyester fabric shut down 30-mph wind gusts—places the Jackson Glacier among the most protective models on the market. Our tester also said that after 15 minutes in the rain, the coat’s fabric began to wet out, so its DWR probably isn’t at the same level as that on the REI Co-op Stormhenge or the Arc’teryx Ralle Down Parka.
The Jackson Glacier’s 75-denier outer fabric isn’t very soft to the touch, but that just gave our tester more confidence it would hold up well in the long run. And he noted that the interior material was smooth and slid nicely over his skin, the stretchy cuffs sealed out wind and moisture well without constricting his wrists, and the adjustable hood felt minimalist if you didn’t want to wear it but expansive when you needed its protection. Given that praise, the Jackson Glacier is reasonably priced for what you get. You can find higher performance or lower prices if you really look, but we’d be thankful to have this jacket on hand if the driveway needs shoveling during a storm. For more, read our review of the Jackson Glacier.
The Stormhenge is by far the least expensive winter jacket we tested, but it feels like a much more premium product. Lofty down and a dialed feature set make for a superb coat overall, but its bland styling might give some folks pause.
The Stormhenge is by far the least expensive winter jacket we tested, but it feels like a much more premium product. Lofty down and a dialed feature set make for a superb coat overall, but its bland styling might give some folks pause.
Warmth
Comfort
Weather Protection
Storage
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 13.6 oz.
Insulation
850-fill down + synthetic
Waterproofing
2-layer HydroWall
Back Length
31.5 in.
Pros
Cons
We’ve never been shy about our assessments of REI’s in-house gear. It’s usually priced to sell, but it often can’t match the performance of more premium competitors. Thus, one Better Trail editor was (very) pleasantly surprised with the REI Stormhenge 850, which he deemed the most comfortable winter lifestyle jacket he’d ever worn. A large factor in this coat’s luxe feel is its satiny interior fabric, which our editor was more than happy to wear over his bare arms as he ran errands around town in snowy Jackson, Wyoming. The Stormhenge’s 850-fill down—an almost ludicrously lofty material for a jacket that costs less than $300—gives it an almost overstuffed feel, in a good way. Although temperatures in Jackson frequently dipped into the teens, our editor felt perfectly warm while swaddled in the Stormhenge.
The jacket’s uncluttered exterior (we will admit that its styling might seem bland to folks who are used to flashier winter attire) belies a model that’s packed with features, some more useful than others. Storage is dialed, with two zippered hand pockets (complete with soft linings), exterior and interior zippered chest pockets, and two internal drop pockets that are great for stashing gloves. The REI Stormhenge also, somewhat oddly, has long pit zips. It’s unlikely you’ll be working hard and overheating in this bulky winter jacket, so they’re a bit superfluous. In contrast, the fully adjustable hood and hook-and-loop cuffs were welcome for battening down the hatches in windy weather, although the latter could be a bit more robust.
Weather protection, on the other hand, is just right. The Stormhenge is designed with REI’s 2-layer HydroWall waterproof material, which, while inferior to brand-name Gore-Tex, had no issue holding off wet snow as winter gave way to spring in the northern Rockies. The PFAS-free DWR also was up to the task, and our tester was able to head out the door fully confident that precipitation would never do more than bead up on the coat’s material. Set-and-forget comfort and protection are always enviable in the jacket world, and we’d be remiss to not remind you that this is the least-expensive jacket in this gear guide. When you’re that far ahead of the competition from a value standpoint, performance like the Stormhenge’s is all the more impressive. For more, read our Stormhenge 850 review.
Perhaps the most technical jacket we tested, the updated Neutrino Pro blends impressive warmth and comfort into a light, packable design. It’s not waterproof, though, and its lack of storage makes it much better suited for the mountains than for use around town.
Perhaps the most technical jacket we tested, the updated Neutrino Pro blends impressive warmth and comfort into a light, packable design. It’s not waterproof, though, and its lack of storage makes it much better suited for the mountains than for use around town.
Warmth
Comfort
Weather Protection
Storage
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 3.9 oz.
Insulation
7.5 oz. of 800-fill down
Waterproofing
None
Back Length
30.3 in.
Pros
Cons
The Neutrino Pro offers excellent warmth for its relatively low weight, especially considering that most winter jackets come in well over 2 pounds. Last year Rab slightly tweaked the formula by switching the hydrophobic down coating to Grangers from Nikwax and decreasing the amount of 800-fill down from 8.1 to 7.5 ounces—shrinkflation comes for everyone these days—but the Neutrino Pro’s high performance remains. Our tester carried this jacket on dozens of ski tours from the Tetons to the Chugach to the Wind River Range and reported that, when worn over his other layers, it proved perfect for keeping him warm on snack breaks and high-alpine conditions in temps ranging from -10°F to 20°F. Any warmer than that might be too toasty for the Neutrino Pro, as it’s made for bold forays into cold places.
Speaking of locations: The Rab Neutrino Pro fits much better in the alpine than at the supermarket, which shouldn’t come as a surprise. With only two zippered hand pockets and a small interior chest pocket, it doesn’t boast nearly as many storage options as the more lifestyle-oriented winter jackets in this gear guide and has a decidedly more technical look. However, it packs down much, much smaller than most (about the size of a football) save for the Patagonia Fitz Roy, and is well-suited to stashing in your pack on a ski tour, mountaineering mission, or camping trip. It’s also supremely comfortable, with a down-filled feel that our tester compared to wearing a cloud, as well as a silky-smooth interior.
Jackets this light and packable will never be as durable as their heavier town-oriented counterparts, but the Neutrino Pro’s 20-denier Pertex Quantum Pro fabric makes it more resilient than the average puffy. Our tester walked through sharp brush and crammed into Alaskan bush planes while wearing it, and the shell never ripped. Plus, despite not being waterproof—another strike against using it as an everyday winter coat—the Pertex Quantum Pro holds off an impressive amount of snow and rain. Don’t wear the Neutrino Pro in a downpour, obviously, but you’ll be able to survive spindrift gusts and wet flakes on snack breaks. When you’re doing so, just be sure to remember all of us folks in our heavy, clunky lifestyle jackets back in town and smile at your choice of attire. Note: The photos and information are based on the new-for-fall-2025 Neutrino Pro; however, that product is not currently for sale at the time of publishing. As such, the links in this guide are to the prior-generation model. To learn more, read our Rab Neutrino Pro review.
This monster of a parka is built for withstanding extreme cold, and folks who want to conserve as much warmth as possible might love it. For the rest of us, though, the Expedition’s bulk, overbuilt feature set, and fairly limited use case are far from ideal.
This monster of a parka is built for withstanding extreme cold, and folks who want to conserve as much warmth as possible might love it. For the rest of us, though, the Expedition’s bulk, overbuilt feature set, and fairly limited use case are far from ideal.
Warmth
Comfort
Weather Protection
Storage
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
3 lb. 14.1 oz.
Insulation
1 lb. 8 oz. of 700-fill down + synthetic
Waterproofing
None
Back Length
33.9 in.
Pros
Cons
The Fjallraven Expedition’s name and aesthetic harken back to an era of exploration in the far-off, frozen corners of the globe. This parka wouldn’t look out of place in the poles or other inhospitable climates where the gear adage is “more is more.” Let’s be real, though: This is a jacket designed for keeping you toasty around town, not in the Arctic, and while it does that extremely well, it’s too bulky and overbuilt for our taste. The Expedition has enormous baffles stuffed with 1 pound, 8 ounces of 700-fill down, and it’s the second-heaviest coat in this gear guide (Fjallraven’s synthetic-filled Nuuk Parka weighs 4 lb. 0.2 oz.). All that plumage, plus a massive hood and collar and a hem that hits well below the hip, make for a parka that’s too warm for temps over 25°F. Anything else had our Jackson Hole-based editor sweating.
All that insulation is good news for folks who run very cold or live in areas where warmth is paramount, but for almost everyone else, the Fjallraven Expedition is just too much jacket. Its huge baffles and thick, stiff fabric make you feel like you’re moving in slow motion, and its seemingly unending layout of toggles, snaps, compartments, and cinches is both confusing and distracting to the eye. Case in point: Even our pocket-loving tester, who likes to find a place in a jacket for every small item he carries, thought the Expedition’s seven separate compartments were overkill. He also found that the snap buttons on the cuffs, like much of the coat’s other features, did a good job of sealing in warmth, but were cumbersome and time-consuming to adjust.
Given the Expedition’s steep price tag, it’s a bit of a letdown that this jacket isn't waterproof. Its thick nylon fabric and PFC-free DWR can stave off more moisture than comparatively thinner and lighter material, but you’ll probably become sodden during exposure to wet snow or rain for a decent stretch of time. Of course, given the coat’s construction and intended use, it’s more than likely that temperatures will be too cold for snow to stick to you, but we’d still like a jacket at this premium price to be fully kitted out, weather protection-wise. We also have durability concerns about all of the Expedition’s flimsy-feeling toggles, which are attached to its myriad adjustment straps. As with the rest of this jacket, they seem better in looks—and theory—than in practice. For more, read our review of the Expedition Down Jacket.
To almost nobody’s surprise, this ultra-premium parka from Arc’teryx is one of the most expensive jackets on the market. For the price, you get excellent warmth, along with top-notch comfort and durability. Its long cut isn’t for everyone, though.
To almost nobody’s surprise, this ultra-premium parka from Arc’teryx is one of the most expensive jackets on the market. For the price, you get excellent warmth, along with top-notch comfort and durability. Its long cut isn’t for everyone, though.
Warmth
Comfort
Weather Protection
Storage
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
2 lb. 0.4 oz.
Insulation
6.1 oz. of 750-fill down
Waterproofing
2-layer Gore-Tex
Back Length
35 in.
Pros
Cons
The Ralle Down Parka is probably the most fashion-forward jacket we’ve tested, but Arc’teryx brings its full technical knowledge to bear on this high-quality parka. Along with the Patagonia Stormshadow ($899), the Ralle is the only model in this roundup to feature Gore-Tex waterproofing, in this case a 2-layer membrane with an 80-denier plain-weave nylon face fabric. As you might expect, that construction results in serious weather protection: Our Jackson, Wyoming-based tester applauded the Ralle for keeping him completely dry even while he was snow blowing his driveway in gusty weather. Neither snow, nor sleet, nor rain ever penetrated the jacket’s fabric, and he deemed the Ralle perhaps the most protective single layer he’d ever worn. The long parka cut also helps with that as well, with a hem that hits well down the thigh.
In continuing the premium materials parade, the Arc'teryx Ralle Down Parka contains 6.1 ounces of 750-fill down. Because this coat is relatively light, though, at a hair over 2 pounds, the Ralle doesn’t pack in as much fill or provide quite as much warmth as the enormous Fjallraven Expedition (3 lb. 14.1 oz., with 1 lb. 8 oz. off 700-fill down) or even the Stormshadow (2 lb. 9.7 oz., and containing 9.1 oz. of 700-fill down), but our tester thought it kept him cozy enough in weather from 15°F to 30°F with only thin layers underneath. (Anything over 30°F and you should reach for another coat.) The down baffles and interior fabric also feel soft on skin, and we’d happily wear the Ralle over just a t-shirt.
There’s no doubt that the Ralle is a handsome, polished parka. But we’d be remiss if we didn’t talk about the price, and it’s a doozy. Paying almost $1,000 for any jacket—let alone one designed primarily for wear around town—is no joke. Yes, the Patagonia Stormshadow costs almost as much, but we give it the edge in value just because it’s warmer. We will admit that the Ralle looks fantastic if you’re the sort of person who can pull off the long parka look (this article’s writer, for instance, cannot). If you have the cash, we seriously doubt you’ll ever regret buying this jacket. But if looks are secondary to function, there are other good options to consider. For more, read our Ralle Down Parka review.
The Stormshadow Parka ranks among the top jackets we tested in terms of warmth and weather protection. With that high performance comes an extremely high price tag, although you probably won’t be complaining once you put on this well-made coat.
The Stormshadow Parka ranks among the top jackets we tested in terms of warmth and weather protection. With that high performance comes an extremely high price tag, although you probably won’t be complaining once you put on this well-made coat.
Warmth
Comfort
Weather Protection
Storage
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
2 lb. 9.7 oz.
Insulation
9.1 oz. of 700-fill down
Waterproofing
2-layer Gore-Tex
Back Length
32 in.
Pros
Cons
Here you have it: The cream of the winter lifestyle jacket crop, a jacket that excels in almost every way, and at a price that will make you want to shield your eyes. This is one of the warmest coats we’ve tested, and it nearly matches the Fjallraven Expedition in that metric while eschewing that jacket’s surplus of weight and bulk. Give credit to the Stormshadow’s 9.1 ounces of 700-fill down, which ranks second in fill weight to the Expedition (a mind-boggling 1 lb. 8 oz. of 700FP) and long, hip-covering cut. Along with thoughtful features, such as a low-profile yet effective storm flap on the main zipper and button cuffs, this parka helped our tester thrive in Jackson, Wyoming’s bone-chilling 10°F weather. (If the Stormshadow feels overkill, consider the Lightweight Stormshadow Jacket ($649), which features 7.5 ounces of 700-fill down and a shorter cut.)
Patagonia designed the Stormshadow Parka with 2-layer Gore-Tex waterproofing, making it one of only two models in this gear guide (along with the Arc’teryx Ralle Down Parka; $900) with that premium construction. As a result, this jacket should be able to keep you dry in pretty much every type of winter weather. Our tester even wore the Stormshadow for a couple of days of resort snowboarding and reported that he never felt a drop of moisture, even on an epic pow day. (We wouldn’t usually recommend a lifestyle jacket as a snowboarding layer, but if it works, it works.) He also noted that the adjustable snap cuffs fit well with multiple types of gloves and that the two-way zipper let him dump some heat out of the bottom hem if he needed to.
Patagonia’s commendable construction quality is on full display in the Stormshadow. The interior lining is smooth and inviting, and the outer fabric—though durable, as it’s a 75-denier polyester—is also relatively soft to the touch. The Stormshadow has five pockets—two hand pockets, external and internal zippered chest pockets, and an interior drop pocket—that provide just the right amount of storage. Our tester wasn’t a huge fan of the hand pockets’ high placement, though, which he thought was awkward for comfortably warming his fingers. Otherwise, though, this parka’s design is as good as the category offers. Now: Is the Stormshadow worth $900? We think that there are plenty of excellent options that cost half that. But in the end, the Stormshadow is an extremely well-made, warm, and protective jacket, with Patagonia styling. If you can afford it, it won’t let you down. To learn more, read our review of the Stormshadow Parka.
The McMurdo might look like the classic “city slicker” parka, but it packs in plenty of performance. This is a warm, reliably protective jacket, but its heavy weight and stiff construction prevent it from reaching top-tier status.
The McMurdo might look like the classic “city slicker” parka, but it packs in plenty of performance. This is a warm, reliably protective jacket, but its heavy weight and stiff construction prevent it from reaching top-tier status.
Warmth
Comfort
Weather Protection
Storage
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
3 lb. 4.6 oz.
Insulation
600-fill down
Waterproofing
2-layer DryVent
Back Length
32.2 in.
Pros
Cons
The McCurdo Parka excels on multiple fronts and has remained a popular winter jackets for years, particularly among the urban set. Starting with price, The North Face keeps costs reasonable by kitting it out with the brand’s proprietary 2-layer DryVent waterproof fabric and 600-fill down. Of note: this is less lofty than the 700-plus fill found in competitors such as the Patagonia Jackson Glacier and REI Stormhenge. But even with its less-than-premium materials, this jacket doles out winter-worthy doses of warmth and weather protection. Our tester never felt chilly during walks to work in 10°F weather, and the McMurdo Parka kept precipitation out during winter storms. There are warmer models on this list, but between 10°F and 25°F, this parka should do the job just fine.
There are some drawbacks to the McMurdo’s design, though. This is a bulky and somewhat stiff coat, and our tester found that the stiff nylon shell fabric curtailed his mobility a bit when he was shoveling snow. He also found the front pocket layout slightly awkward, with the hand pockets—located behind cargo-style compartments near the waist—situated at an awkward angle, and the cargo pockets unlined and a bit cold. Thankfully, the rest of the jacket’s storage is fairly dialed, with helpful zippered chest pockets on the exterior and interior, good for holding your wallet, keys, or phone.
We had some additional quibbles with the McMurdo, namely that it doesn’t have a cinch at the waist to reign in the jacket’s bulky silhouette, and that the faux fur around the rim of the hood feels claustrophobic when the hood is up and the collar zipped. (You can remove the fur if you want.) But the parka’s plain-weave polyester lining feels smooth to the touch and eminently wearable, and the McMurdo’s 70-denier by 160-denier nylon shell is thick enough to endure pretty much anything you can throw at it in an urban environment. And that’s really what you want with a jacket like this: It’ll be with you through thick and thin—at least as far as cold-weather commutes are concerned—and you don’t have to pay an arm and a leg for it. For more, read our review of the McMurdo Parka.
The Nuuk is the only fully synthetic jacket we tested, but it’s priced more like a premium down product. We found it to be less warm and weather-resistant than competitors, but some folks might appreciate its bold styling.
The Nuuk is the only fully synthetic jacket we tested, but it’s priced more like a premium down product. We found it to be less warm and weather-resistant than competitors, but some folks might appreciate its bold styling.
Warmth
Comfort
Weather Protection
Storage
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
4 lb. 0.2 oz.
Insulation
250g synthetic
Waterproofing
Hydratic lining
Back Length
34.6 in.
Pros
Cons
The Nuuk Parka stands out from the winter jacket pack. With a removable faux fur hood lining, two pairs of enormous pockets on the front, a long cut, and bold colorways, it makes a statement whether you’re strolling down the street or posted up for aprés. Weighing just over 4 pounds, the Nuuk is undeniably heavy, but its 250-gram synthetic insulation delivers warmth on par with competitors such as the down-filled The North Face McMurdo Parka. Our tester deemed temperatures in the low 20s to be the bottom of the Nuuk’s comfort range with a simple t-shirt underneath, which is a roughly average mark in the winter jacket category.
This parka was similarly average when it came to weather resistance. Although Fjallraven built the Nuuk with the brand’s proprietary Hydratic waterproof liner on the interior, our tester found that the jacket’s canvas-like exterior became soaked with rain almost immediately (though he never got wet underneath). The thick material cuts wind effectively, and synthetic insulation comes with the benefit of continuing to insulate when wet (unlike down). Still, nobody likes to look and feel like they’re sopping wet. That type of wet-weather performance places the Nuuk behind models like Patagonia’s Jackson Glacier and Arc’teryx’s Ralle, and even the much less expensive REI Co-op Stormhenge 850 Down Hybrid Jacket, which all have effective DWR coatings and multi-layer waterproof materials.
One thing the Fjallraven Nuuk Parka does especially well is storage. This assessment might come as a surprise, as we’re usually not huge fans of jackets with oodles of pockets. But this parka goes so far beyond the norm—with 11 compartments, it has by far the most organization space of any model we’ve tested. You can fit virtually every small item you need for a long day in town into this coat, just so long as you can remember where you put everything. The four large, flap-covered front pockets are the most obvious, and the hand pockets that hide behind the bottom two are fleece-lined. It also has a whopping four interior compartments, so you can stash chapstick and snacks for your entire party. In the end, the Nuuk strikes us as a little over-priced considering its average warmth and all-around performance. But it’s hard to knock the high-end build quality and features, and the bold styling certainly will certainly have fans. For more, read our review of the Nuuk Parka.
With mid-thigh coverage and generous down fill, this is a seriously warm parka for the price. The REI Campwell is not the softest or most refined option, and the sleeves run a bit short, but it remains one of the best winter-ready jacket values available.
With mid-thigh coverage and generous down fill, this is a seriously warm parka for the price. The REI Campwell is not the softest or most refined option, and the sleeves run a bit short, but it remains one of the best winter-ready jacket values available.
Warmth
Comfort
Weather Protection
Storage
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
2 lb. 4 oz.
Insulation
650-fill down + synthetic
Waterproofing
None
Back Length
35 in.
Pros
Cons
The REI Co-op Campwell Parka is all about warmth and value. With thick down insulation and a long, mid-thigh cut, it feels like you’re wearing a sleeping bag—ideal for frigid commutes, tailgating after a ski day, or winter walks. The burly nylon shell isn’t waterproof, but it handles dry snow and wind well, and the synthetic-filled hood continues to insulate even when damp. REI unfortunately doesn’t provide the jacket’s fill weight, but warmth is one of its defining traits, and you’ll be hard-pressed to find this level of insulation for the $229 price tag (note: it’s often on sale for less).
The Campwell isn’t the most refined winter parka, but it’s comfortable in the right ways. A smooth liner helps it slide easily over layers, and details like fleece-backed hand pockets and stretchy cuffs are a nice touch. The burly outer fabric does give it a slightly stiff feel compared to pricier competitors like the Patagonia Jackson Glacier, but the Campwell still wears well for daily use. Storage is basic (just three total pockets), and the sleeves run about an inch short, which was our tester’s only major fit gripe. That said, the jacket has a reliable, hardwearing build and thoughtful features like a two-way zipper and a well-shaped, adjustable hood.
In short, this is a no-frills winter piece done right. You won’t get the polish of a $400+ option like The North Face McMurdo, and REI’s own Stormhenge 850 offers superior waterproofing, but the Campwell still offers excellent protection for cold, dry days and daily life around town. If you’re not heading into heavy rain and the sleeve length works for your frame, this is one of the best winter-ready values out there. For more, read our review of the REI Campwell Parka.
The lightest jacket in this gear guide is also one of the most comfortable. The Fitz Roy leverages lofty down and soft materials to achieve a feel that might seem slightly sinful in the backcountry, but its warmth and weather resistance both rank relatively low.
The lightest jacket in this gear guide is also one of the most comfortable. The Fitz Roy leverages lofty down and soft materials to achieve a feel that might seem slightly sinful in the backcountry, but its warmth and weather resistance both rank relatively low.
Warmth
Comfort
Weather Protection
Storage
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 1.1 oz.
Insulation
6.4 oz. of 800-fill down
Waterproofing
None
Back Length
29 in.
Pros
Cons
While many winter jackets primarily keep it casual, the Fitz Roy is made for moving efficiently in the alpine. Actually, let us clarify: It’s designed to keep you warm on breaks from said efficient movement and not to weigh you down or take up too much space in your pack. In those respects, the Fitz Roy succeeds. It's 800-fill down and thin materials made it a perfect parka for one tester to fit into his kit for climbing Mount Kilimanjaro, where the Fitz Roy was his faithful companion in camp and on the summit push. We’d have no problem stuffing it into a ski touring pack or a climbing bag, something that you can’t say about almost any other model in this roundup (even the Rab Neutrino Pro is a bit bulkier).
With that low weight and high packability comes below-average warmth, though. We found the Fitz Roy Hoody prime for sitting stationary in camp or at the crag in temps from around 20°F to 40°F (depending on layering beneath), but below that, we’d reach for something with more insulation such as the aforementioned Neutrino Pro. Like the Neutrino Pro, this jacket also lacks waterproofing, but its DWR-coated Pertex Quantum fabric can’t match the water resistance of the Neutrino Pro’s Pertex Quantum Pro. If any sort of precipitation is in the forecast, make sure you have your shell on hand. Thankfully, what the Fitz Roy gives up in insulation, it makes up for in general comfort. Our tester likened it to a silky, cozy sleeping bag, and said that the jacket seemed to “float” off his body. That’s a far cry from some of the heavy, stiff coats featured in this test.
Unlike those models, though, you’ll have to be mindful of how you handle the Fitz Roy. Its 20-denier shell is the least tear-resistant material on any coat in our lineup, and it speaks to the Fitz Roy’s specialized use case as opposed to general around-town coats. Keep it in fighting shape, though, and you’ll be rewarded with this comfy jacket’s added bonus of smartly designed pockets. Two zippered hand pockets (one doubles as a storage sack), two large zippered exterior chest pockets, and an interior drop pocket should be all you need to keep track of small items on your next scramble or ski tour. Finally, while the Fitz Roy’s $399 price tag is expensive compared to other midweight puffies it’s on the affordable end of this blue-chip category. To learn more, read our review of the Fitz Roy Down Hoody.
Compare Winter Jackets
This well-constructed coat exhibits all the hallmarks of Patagonia quality at a reasonable price (well, reasonable for the category, at least). The Jackson Glacier isn’t as warm or waterproof as more premium models, but it’ll get the job done in the majority of winter conditions.
Warmth
Comfort
Weather Protection
Storage
Durability
Sustainability
The Stormhenge is by far the least expensive winter jacket we tested, but it feels like a much more premium product. Lofty down and a dialed feature set make for a superb coat overall, but its bland styling might give some folks pause.
Warmth
Comfort
Weather Protection
Storage
Durability
Sustainability
Perhaps the most technical jacket we tested, the updated Neutrino Pro blends impressive warmth and comfort into a light, packable design. It’s not waterproof, though, and its lack of storage makes it much better suited for the mountains than for use around town.
Warmth
Comfort
Weather Protection
Storage
Durability
Sustainability
Also Worth Considering...
Helly Hansen Urb Lab Down Parka ($475): A Sleek Parka Alternative
It’s no secret that the Arc’teryx Ralle Down Parka and the Patagonia Stormshadow Parka are two of our favorite jackets in this guide, but boy are they expensive. The Urb Lab Down Parka gives you an option to blend those models’ refined looks, long cuts, and down fill/waterproof combos with a price point that seems like a mistake (the good kind). Helly Hansen built the Urb Lab with its primo Helly Tech Professional waterproofing membrane, which goes a long way to protect the down fill in drippy weather. The jacket's 480-fill-power down is quite a few steps below the Ralle and the Stormshadow’s loft though, so don't expect the same amount of warmth. But from an aesthetic (and financial) perspective, there's a lot to like about the Urb Lab. And if you're looking for a jacket that can cross over to the slopes, Helly Hansen's lineup is a great place to start—check out the brand's Juniper 3.0, a ski jacket that also looks the part in the city.
Marmot Fordham ($325): Lofty Expectations
Of the jackets in this gear guide that contain 700-or-higher fill down, only one—the REI Co-op Stormhenge 850—costs less than $450. The Fordham is thus a welcome entry in this category, with its 700-fill insulation and a price that won’t cause your blood pressure to rise. (At a pound heavier than the Stormhenge, it’s also likely warmer than that jacket, if perhaps not as fluffy and cozy.) The Fordham doesn’t have a ton of storage—you get dual-entry hand pockets and an interior zippered pocket—but its hood zips off and it has a waterproof coating. We’ll have to see how well that coating holds off moisture compared to a waterproof membrane like you’d find on the Stormhenge or the Patagonia jackets we’ve tested, so it remains to be seen if the Fordham provides good bang for the buck or gets lost in the shuffle.
Mountain Hardwear Nevadan Down Parka ($360): Retro Appeal at a Reasonable Price
The Nevadan Down Parka is a slightly less in-your-face alternative to The North Face’s McMurdo Parka, for $40 less. Its aesthetic leans a bit more campground minimalist than the McMurdo’s fur-trimmed, pockets-galore urban maximalism, but the Nevadan looks to have plenty of storage (it’s just less evident on the surface) and 650-fill down that’s a wee bit loftier than the McMurdo’s 600-fill stuffing. That said, it weighs about half that of the McMurdo and won’t be as warm, and this jacket is not waterproof. But the Nevadan might be a more versatile piece, and you can always add more layers underneath on cold days where it might feel overmatched.
Want More Options?
The winter jackets above represent our small group of selects, but we’ve researched and tested a much larger pool of products. You can view all the winter jackets we've reviewed via the link below.
Our Testing and Team
With more than four decades of outdoor gear testing experience among our founding team—backed by an ever-growing crew of expert testers—our winter jacket guide is a living, evolving resource. Our testers are well-versed in evaluating high-performance, technical gear, and they bring that same critical eye to everyday winter jackets. The result is a thoughtfully assembled set of recommendations suited to a wide range of users and conditions, with a strong focus on how these jackets perform in real-world use. And while our current picks reflect our favorites right now, this is just a snapshot of our broader testing: We’ve fully reviewed 10 winter jackets thus far, and our team’s collective testing experience spans thousands of hours of wear and well over 100 products.
Highlights from Better Trail’s winter jacket testing:
- Jonas Hill took the Patagonia Fitz Roy on a week-long expedition to climb Mt. Kilimanjaro, wearing it non-stop around camp and even throughout the entirety of summit day.
- Anchorage-based tester Matt Hage relied on the Arc’teryx Therme Down Parka during a two-week trip to Fairbanks, where afternoon temperatures ranged from -50 to -30°F. When someone calls 10°F a “warmer” winter day, you know they’ve seen some cold.
- We sent four jackets to a group of friends in Jackson, Wyoming, who put them through a full winter of use, comparing notes along the way.
- Our Snoqualmie Pass-based tester Henri Halle was a perfect match for the waterproof Patagonia Jackson Glacier. He got plenty of use out of it, wearing it nearly every time he wasn’t skiing—from shoveling and snowblowing to digging out the truck after overnight storms and running errands around town.
Our Ratings Explained
As you peruse our winter jacket reviews, it's helpful to know that a jacket’s overall score is the best indicator of its general quality. We determine this score by considering each of a given model’s key traits, including its warmth, weather protection, features, durability, and more. The jackets in this guide are, by and large, high-quality and received impressive overall scores. Our philosophy is that there’s no real reason to purchase a subpar winter jacket, especially if you’re paying as much money as many of the models in this category cost.
Keep in mind that a jacket that has a lower overall score than some competitors may stand out in other areas—perhaps it’s exceptionally waterproof, for example, or presents excellent value. Whatever it is, we make sure to call out the best qualities of every jacket.
Warmth is perhaps the most important factor in choosing a winter jacket, and we give this considerable weight when considering our overall scores. Generally, the best winter coats will keep you toasty even as the mercury plummets, making venturing outside in freezing weather much more pleasant as a result. Not every model provides maximum warmth, though (and you might not need it depending on conditions), and our scores in this category reflect that. Helpful features such as well-designed hoods, cuffs, and collars also help here.
The biggest, baddest heat-hoarders around. These jackets will keep you warm even as the thermometer approaches zero degrees.
Coats that are less warm than the category’s standouts, but still have enough insulation for temperatures into the 20s.
Lightly insulated jackets that are not built for truly cold conditions. These models are exceedingly rare in this category.
Along with its warmth, a jacket’s comfort level will significantly impact how often you want to wear it. Coats with user-friendly designs that incorporate soft fabrics (both inside and out), high mobility, and accommodating fits score highest here. This is perhaps the most subjective of our ratings categories, as one tester’s appealing fabric and comfy cut may not be another user’s cup of tea.
Luxurious-feeling jackets that you’d be happy to wear for a full day if you needed to. They have soft materials, designs that move well with your body, and simply feel great.
Models that are pleasant enough to wear for most outings, but lack the premium materials and feel of this category’s highest-rated coats.
Jackets that have a utilitarian feel, and ones you’ll only wear to keep warm if you must.
Preventing snow and rain from soaking into your clothes is one of a winter jacket’s most important attributes. The models in this gear guide vary in terms of how effective their wind- and waterproofing is, though, so make sure you choose a coat that matches your environment. Constantly faced with heavy, wet snow, rain, and wind? Prioritize a jacket that scores well in this category. Live in a place with more placid weather? You don’t need quite that amount of armor-like protection, and might be able to pay less as a result.
No amount of snow, rain, or wind will penetrate these jackets. They’ll keep you dry—and warm—in most anything short of a hurricane.
Coats that will fend off the elements for a decent period of time, but will start to wet out or soak through during extended exposure.
Jackets that are not waterproof, although they might have a DWR coating that provides a small amount of water resistance.
We’re unabashed pocket nerds here at Better Trail, and a smart storage layout helps elevate any winter jacket’s standing in our eyes. The top models in this category have enough pockets to hold anything you might want on your person, but aren’t so complicated that you often can’t remember where you stashed your chapstick. Standouts include Fjallraven's Nuuk (11 total pockets!) and REI's well-organized Stormhenge 850 Hybrid.
Coats with just the right amount of storage, laid out intuitively, and granting easy access.
Jackets that might not have enough pockets to please everyone, or perhaps a slightly confusing array of compartments.
Models with little to no storage space.
Winter jackets see a lot of use and cost a pretty penny, so you would be wise to purchase one that’s durable enough to last for several years. (Plus, there’s a strong sustainability argument to be made for holding on to usable gear for as long as possible.) Well-constructed coats made with burly materials are the leaders in this category, and there’s usually (but not always) a high correlation between longevity and weight in the winter jacket ecosystem. Smooth, chunky zippers and well-designed pull tabs and toggles also stand out. Durability may not be as high a priority on many buyers’ lists compared to warmth or comfort, but nobody wants a jacket that will easily rip or fail.
Models that will hold up to years of constant use without suffering much damage, if any at all. They’re made with thick, strong materials and exhibit very high construction quality.
These coats will probably last you for a number of seasons, but they might experience more wear and tear.
You’ll have to treat these relatively thin, potentially rip-prone jackets with care.
Our sustainability rating for winter jackets takes into account 11 different criteria. At the product level, we’re looking for recycled or Bluesign-approved materials, PFAS-free durable water-repellent finishes and membranes, and responsibly sourced down (if applicable). At the brand level, our criteria include whether the company engages in responsible manufacturing, uses recycled or reduced packaging, has a dedicated repair service for winter jackets, offers a resale or recycling program, monitors greenhouse gas emissions, and publishes an annual impact report. We also consider the degree to which our criteria are met; for example, a product with 10% recycled materials gets a lower score than one with 100% recycled materials. Note that not every sustainability effort by a brand or product aligns neatly into our categories—in these circumstances, we may adjust a rating up or down based on these factors. You can find details on these factors in the sustainability drop-down under each product above.
These winter jackets are among the most sustainable on the market and earn our Better Trail Certified distinction. They often meet most of our sustainability criteria for this category.
These winter jackets are a good, middle-of-the-pack option for sustainability. They often meet about half or more of our criteria for this category.
These winter jackets are the least sustainable and have significant room for improvement. They usually only meet about a quarter or less of our criteria.
Anatomy of a Winter Jacket
Nylon
The majority of the jackets in this guide are constructed with a nylon shell. (You may notice that some brands list their jacket’s shell material as “polyamide,” but without splitting hairs, they’re essentially the same thing.) Nylon has a high strength-to-weight ratio and is relatively inexpensive, which makes it an ideal material for building outdoor gear that sees a lot of use, like these coats do. Nylon is good (but not great) at not absorbing water, which is why manufacturers also kit their jackets out with durable water-repellent (DWR) coatings and waterproof membranes; more on those below. Finally, nylon is typically scratchier-feeling than polyester, but since your skin won’t usually come into contact with a jacket’s shell fabric, that doesn’t matter that much.
Polyester
Polyester is slightly less common than nylon as a shell material among the coats we’ve tested, but there are still plenty of models in the category that incorporate it. This fabric is comparatively softer than nylon (especially in its plain-weave form, as seen in the Patagonia Jackson Glacier) but has a lower strength-to-weight ratio. It’s lighter, though, and is even better at not absorbing water. Designers will still include DWRs and waterproof membranes on polyester jackets to seal out precipitation, but this is a fine material for building a winter jacket.
Every winter jacket we’ve tested has a durable water-repellent (DWR) coating of some sort. DWRs are a garment’s first line of defense against rain and snow, and they cause precipitation to bead on the surface of a coat’s material instead of soaking into the fabric. DWRs are not fully waterproof, though, so your jacket will wet out in extended exposure to heavy moisture. If that happens, the waterproof membrane (see below), if present, will prevent you from getting wet.
Impressively, all of the DWR coatings in this guide are PFAS free. Outdoor apparel manufacturers are steadily moving away from the use of forever chemicals, which is a big win for everyone—and the planet. (Note: You’ll probably have to wash a jacket with PFAS-free DWR more often to keep the coating fresh and effective.) For more information, check out our sustainability team's article: PFAS in Outdoor Gear, Explained.
The majority of the coats in this gear guide feature a waterproof-breathable membrane, which is essential for preventing rain and snow from soaking through to your underlayers. These membranes are typically laminated to the inside of a jacket’s shell and are impermeable to water, while still allowing air to move through the material via microscopic perforations.
The most well-known waterproof-breathable membrane manufacturer is Gore-Tex, and for good reason: We’ve found that its membranes are typically the best at keeping water out while still allowing high breathability. There are plenty of impressive proprietary membranes designed by jacket manufacturers, though—Patagonia H2No material, for example—and you’ll find those sprinkled throughout the models in this roundup as well.
Not everybody needs a jacket with a waterproof membrane, though. They add weight, bulk, and—perhaps most notably—usually increase the price of a coat. If you live in a place where the winters are generally dry or are consistently quite cold (think mid-20s and below on average) you probably don’t need to spring for a waterproof model. Either there won’t be a ton of precipitation or the precip will be in the form of dry snow that easily sloughs off even a non-waterproof jacket. Folks that live in relatively wet, warm environments, though—Pacific Northwest residents, raise your hands—will want to opt for a waterproof coat.
Down
Down is the most premium fill material that manufacturers use for insulating apparel. This fluffy plumage, which comes from geese or ducks, offers supreme warmth-to-weight qualities by trapping large amounts of warm air, thus helping to conserve your body heat. Down is also highly compressible, making it coveted for ultra-packable technical jackets, but that’s less of a concern in the lifestyle jacket category. What down does not do well is insulate when it gets wet, which is when the plumage loses its loft and, consequently, its heat-trapping quality. The down in many coats features a hydrophobic coating to combat moisture, and that’s where waterproof-breathable membranes come in as well.
The higher a jacket’s down fill power is (e.g. 850 vs. 650) the more it lofts, which means better insulation at less weight and more packability. At the high end, high-performance models such as the REI Co-op Stormhenge 850 (850 FP), Rab Neutrino Pro (800 FP), and Arc’teryx Ralle (750 FP) boast relatively lofty down. Jackets such as The North Face’s McMurdo Parka (600 FP) are heavier and bulkier for their warmth, and also usually cost a bit less.
We should also note that just because a jacket possesses high-fill-power down does not necessarily mean it’s as warm as a model with the same fill power, or even a coat with less lofty insulation. That’s because fill weight—the total weight of the down contained in the jacket—also matters, as does a jacket’s overall construction. For example, the Neutrino Pro and the Patagonia Fitz Roy both contain 800-fill down, but the Rab Neutrino Pro is warmer because it contains 7.5 ounces of the material compared to the Fitz Roy’s 6.4 ounces. Likewise, the Stormhenge (850 FP) is less toasty than the Fjallraven Expedition Down Jacket (700 FP), because that coat is much heavier and contains a whopping 1 pound, 8 ounces of down.
Synthetic
Synthetic insulation, which is made from polyester, is a cheaper and less lofty alternative to down. It’s less warm for its weight, which results in synthetic coats usually being heavier and bulkier than comparably toasty down jackets. However, synthetic insulation will continue to insulate even when it’s wet, as it doesn’t lose loft like down does. A synthetic coat might be a better choice if you’re venturing out in consistently soggy weather. Out of the jackets we’ve reviewed so far, only one model—the Fjallraven Nuuk Parka—is fully made with synthetic insulation. However, the Nuuk didn’t impress us with its overall weather resistance, and so we recommend looking further afield.
Alternatively, some of the models we’ve tested that contain a majority of down fill, such as the Stormhenge 850, also contain synthetic insulation in areas that are exposed and prone to getting wet. (In the Stormhenge’s case that’s the shoulders, side panels, hood, and cuffs.) The idea here is that down located in those areas might lose its loft if especially wet conditions overwhelm the jacket’s membrane, while the synthetic fill will keep on truckin’. A down/synthetic hybrid jacket is a good compromise if you want to take advantage of down’s cushy feel and warmth, while also upping the jacket’s overall weather resistance.
A winter coat’s hood is one of its most important protective elements in the event of nasty weather. A good hood is spacious enough that it covers your entire head (including the sides, and over a beanie) when you put it up, but not so unwieldy that it hinders your sightlines or blows around in the wind. Some hoods on models that are designed for backcountry use—the Neutrino Pro and the Fitz Roy, for example—slide over a ski or climbing helmet, which is useful for technical missions. Many hoods have toggles you can use to tighten them, and some are lined with faux fur for both aesthetic and an extra dose of coziness. All of the models in this review have hoods, although there are plenty of winter coats without one.
We appreciate the ability to store whatever you might want on hand in your coat, and so we’re big fans of models with lots of pockets. Maximalism seems to be the trend in winter lifestyle jackets these days, and so many of the coats in this review are kitted out with hand pockets, chest pockets, and interior compartments—and some, such as the Fjallraven Expedition Down Jacket, have many more storage options than that. If your aesthetics tend to fall on the more minimal side of things, a more svelte model, such as the Rab Neutrino Pro and its two hand pockets, one internal pocket loadout, might be more your speed.
Jacket cuffs help seal out wind and rain and seal in warmth. Nonadjustable elastic versions often work just fine and are plenty comfortable, but our favorite cuff designs often have adjustable hook-and-loop closures so you can customize their width to maximize protection and fit either over or under gloves.
Winter jackets come in a variety of lengths, and there are tradeoffs to both short and long designs. Coats with relatively short lengths, such as the Fitz Roy (29-in. back), Neutrino Pro (30.3 in.), and Stormhenge 850 (31.5 in.) often feel a bit less constricting and offer better mobility than models with longer cuts. In the case of the first two, that makes them much better for technical endeavors, and helps them pack down smaller as well.
However, parkas with long designs—including the Ralle (35-in. back length), Nuuk (34.6 in.), and Expedition (33.9-in.), while bulkier and heavier, also provide better weather protection and conserve more warmth due to their increased coverage. They thrive in ultra-cold environments (the Upper Midwest in the dead of winter, perhaps) where you want to layer insulation over as much of your body as possible. They also keep your bottom and thighs from getting wet if it's snowing or raining hard, something that short coats can’t do.
Finally, it’s helpful to know that some of the jackets we’ve reviewed are available in both regular (short) and parka (long versions). The construction of both versions is, usually, largely the same—they contain the same fill power down, have the same waterproofing, and usually feature an equal amount of pockets and identical hood construction—but the parka will be heavier overall, and if it’s a down jacket will contain a higher fill weight. (Occasionally, the shorter version of the jacket will have tweaked materials to make it even lighter.) Some models in this gear guide that come in short and long versions are the Patagonia Jackson Glacier, Patagonia Stormshadow, and Fjallraven Expedition.
Your Questions Answered
Winter coats are not cheap. There are only two jackets in this gear guide that cost less than $399 (REI's Co-op Stormhenge 850 Down Hybrid Jacket and Campwell Down Parka, at $279 and $229, respectively), and some of the models come in north of $700. Those prices may seem daunting—we don’t blame you—but you definitely don’t need to drop almost a grand on an ultra-fancy parka. For most people, a jacket in the $400 range (The North Face McMurdo, say) will still offer plenty of warmth and weather protection and suffice in all but the absolutely coldest and nastiest winter conditions (remember you can always layer up underneath as well). Going up in price opens the door to coats that are ultra-insulating and protective, as well as perhaps fulfill your specific aesthetic needs, but by no means do you need to spend an arm and a leg to get a good product in this category.
For more info, check out our in-depth review of the Stormhenge 850 as well as our write-up on the McMurdo.
The main differences between a lifestyle coat and a technical jacket that you’d wear for winter mountaineering, backcountry camping, or skiing are mostly concerned with waterproofing, weight, and bulk. Some lifestyle jackets are warm enough for truly frigid conditions, but almost none of the models we’ve tested have waterproofing that’s burly enough to handle constant wet snow, for example. Soggy conditions like that require high-quality, 3-layer waterproofing, which is overkill in the lifestyle category.
Additionally, the ability to stash a coat away in your pack when you’re not using it is key for technical adventures, and of the jackets we reviewed, only two—the Rab Neutrino Pro and the Patagonia Fitz Roy—are light and compressible enough to do so. (The Neutrino Pro is the most technical jacket in the test; read our Neutrino Pro review for more.) The vast majority of the models in this test are also way too heavy to carry around when you’re not using them. Finally, breathability is an issue as well. While you wouldn’t want to be working too hard in a heavy technical jacket—they’re meant more for stationary activities like snack breaks or belaying—you still want a modicum of breathability, which lifestyle coats lack.
No. Most of the coats in this guide have some form of waterproof membrane, but the Rab Neutrino Pro, Fjallraven Expedition, and the Patagonia Fitz Roy do not. All of those models feature a DWR coating on their exterior fabric and can thus withstand some amount of cold, dry snow or brief bouts of rain, but if precipitation is frequently in your forecast, you might want to opt for a fully waterproof jacket.
The answer to this question echoes our thoughts on technical jackets above. The coats in this gear guide are, generally, too heavy and bulky, not breathable enough, and not quite at the level of waterproofing you’d want in a true ski jacket. You could make a few of them work in a pinch—the Rab Neutrino Pro, Patagonia Fitz Roy, and REI Co-op Stormhenge aren’t the worst options for a casual day of cold, fair-weather skiing—but having a dedicated ski jacket will make you far happier in the long run. Check out this article on the best dedicated ski jackets you can buy.
For truly frigid weather (let’s call it 15°F and below), you’ll want a heavy coat that’s stuffed with lots of insulation and has features that maximize warmth. Models such as the Patagonia Stormshadow Parka, Arc’teryx Ralle Down Parka, and Fjallraven Expedition Down Jacket fit the bill. Those all have copious amounts of down fill, roomy and insulated hoods, long cuts, and protective collars. These coats are designed for one thing—keeping you warm—and during testing, we found them extremely adept at doing so.
Now, we should note that these ultra-toasty jackets are not for everyone. If you live in a place where the temperature doesn’t frequently dip below 20°F, you’ll likely overheat if you wear one of these behemoths. A lighter, less-warm model will keep you more comfortable, and you’ll probably save money purchasing one. Heavy jackets are also less mobile than more svelte models, so there’s no need to restrict your movement and burden yourself if you don’t have to.
Great question. Our sustainability team conducted a deep dive into this category and identified 11 key criteria for evaluating winter jackets and parkas, covering both product- and brand-level efforts. Impressively, two Patagonia models—the Stormshadow and Jackson Glacier—earned a perfect 5/5 sustainability rating. The REI Co-op Stormhenge 850 Hybrid came in close behind at 4.7/5, followed by strong showings from the Arc’teryx Ralle Down Parka and Fjallraven Expedition. Every product on Better Trail receives a full sustainability analysis (see our Patagonia Stormshadow Sustainability Report for an example), and you can use the “Sort By: Sustainability” filter at the top of the guide to compare scores across the board.
layer up
Learn More About Outdoor Apparel
Gear Guide
Best Down Jackets of 2026
Product Sustainability Report
Arc'teryx Ralle Down Parka Sustainability Report
Product Ranking
The Most Sustainable Down Jackets
Gear Guide
Best Fleece Jackets of 2026
Sustainability
About Our Sustainability Ratings